KELLY OSBOURNE: HEADED FOR HEARTBREAK

Kelly Osbourne, 25, and her lookalike model boyfriend Luke Worrall, 20, have been together since ’08 and rumored to be engaged. But, if Luke’s latest magazine cover is any indication, a wedding may be out of the question. Luke appeared in drag on the cover of Candy - a cross dressing magazine in the UK. He looks awfully comfortable in makeup and women’s attire, causing us to doubt that Kelly will ever be walking down the aisle with him.

16 Comments so far

1. By CoCo
   On December 7, 2009 at

   Don’t get it. Cross dressing precludes neither heterosexual love nor marriage.

2. By Reta
   On December 7, 2009 at

   When I saw how she behaved with her Dancing with the Stars partner, who was VERY masculine, I did wonder about her attraction to this pale skinny young man. They seem more like brother and sister than marraige material. Can’t even BEGIN to imagine them in a hot sexual mode! She needs to drop this faker and get herself a real man now that she has a sleek new body and some great moves too!! She’s grown a lot, maybe she’s grown past this crap too (let’s hope)!!!

3. By Helena Handbasket
   On December 7, 2009 at

   Luke Worrall is just a star-fuc*er, pure and simple. Poor Kelly. Regardless of Luke’s sexual proclivities– he’s just a USER and will break her heart in the end.

4. By BorgQUeen
   On December 7, 2009 at

   While cross dressing does not necessary mean Luke will step out on Kelly with men, he is 5 years younger than Kelly. There’s a big difference, mentally, btwn a 20 yr old and 25 year old woman. And Kelly has matured physically and emotionally so maybe she will outgrow Luke.

5. By Hilary
   On December 7, 2009 at

   As some have already stated, a cross-dresser is not necessarily gay… BUT, in this case…
   Kelly, RUN as fast as you can!

6. By Village
   On December 7, 2009 at

   Oh for heaven’s sake. An cross dresser won’t fit in the Osborne family? She may reject him at some point, but I don’t imagine it will be over this. If he is faithful and loves her, his cross dressing won’t be a problem. Just don’t see it. They are so cute together. I have my figures crossed for them.

7. By Bambi
   On December 7, 2009 at

   Nah, he’s not for Kelly. Sorry all you liberals, but he is seriously f***ed up in the head. Living with Papa Ozzie has messed up her thinking.

8. By Bu
   On December 7, 2009 at

   Cross Dressing is not gay.

9. By Molly
   On December 7, 2009 at

   He didn’t even stand after she danced. Total loser. Dump him now, Kel.

10. By captain america
    On December 7, 2009 at

    americans really must like SISSY-BOYS & FAGGOTS, folks?

11. By Barkley
    On December 8, 2009 at

    He’s gay a straight guy wouldn’t pose like that for a mag cover. And Reta, you say Kelly’s dancing partner was VERY MASCULINE? He’s not and he’s the only out gay on “Dancing with the Stars” although I’m sure most of the other male dancers are as well.

12. By chi chi
    On December 8, 2009 at

    He is too young for her, I agree, it wont be a good thing for her.

13. By CoCo
    On December 8, 2009 at

    Barkley, can’t be gay and masculine? I beg to differ.

14. By Reta
    On December 8, 2009 at

    Barkley, just where do you get your info on who is OUT and GAY on DWTS? There seems to be a whole lot of assuming about people’s sexuality on this site, and I don’t get it. It always seems to be that SOMEONE is gay who isn’t or has never come out as that. Just because someone dances, doesn’t make them gay!!

15. By Beanie
    On December 8, 2009 at

    Whatever, repeat…whatever he is, it is not a good thing and I can’t figure out why a supposedly straight girl would want him.

16. By Barkley
    On December 9, 2009 at

    A lot of straight girls are attracted to gay men and think they can change them. I’ve been in the dance-theater scene in NYC since the 80s and most dancers are gay, there are a few exceptions.

16 Responses to “KELLY OSBOURNE: HEADED FOR HEARTBREAK”