ANGELINA’S RING WAS WORTH WAITING A YEAR FOR


Photo via: Hollywood Reporter

We’ve seen a lot of oversize diamond rings flashed around Hollywood and they all supposedly had astronomical prices. It was doubtful that the gems were top quality and obviously the value was exaggerated. BIG isn’t everything. Angelina Jolie’s engagement ring is different. It’s spectacular in its design simplicity and obvious quality and almost has an art deco feeling. Brad did an artful job of designing – it’s even better than the ring he did for Jennifer Aniston. And nobody’s bragging about the high price. This exquisite ring is going to be knocked off like crazy – somebody in China is probably already wearing one.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Posted by Janet on April 16, 2012

There are 26 Comments.  TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK!

26 Comments so far

  1. By Muffie
    On April 16, 2012 at

    Nice, verry, verry nice! The old man has good taste.

  2. By missyco
    On April 16, 2012 at

    Stunning ring..Just perfect!

  3. By palermo
    On April 16, 2012 at

    I don’t like it

  4. By Cheap dirty Janet
    On April 16, 2012 at

    Not my taste.

  5. By blip
    On April 16, 2012 at

    Meh

  6. By mish mash
    On April 16, 2012 at

    So how many orphans could be fed with the money spent on that ring?

  7. By True disbeliever
    On April 16, 2012 at

    Like the design but hate the color.

  8. By Joe
    On April 16, 2012 at

    If those are Angelina’s claws, where is the blood under the tips of the nails? Surely, the woman draws blood every so often, more often than not.

  9. By forrest gump
    On April 16, 2012 at

    agree, it takes alot of time & flying to save it up from the free “Air Miles”. folks!!

  10. By Bu
    On April 16, 2012 at

    ugly ring!

  11. By Diva
    On April 17, 2012 at

    boney hands

  12. By Christine India
    On April 17, 2012 at

    The following is true:

    I have a ring almost exacly like that which I got at J.C. Penis about 6 months ago. It is pale yellow, same cut and cost $8.

    Bony hands is right. She needs fillers.

  13. By Dragonfly
    On April 17, 2012 at

    Not my taste at all and the hand and arm is frightening! That is something I would buy at Party City to use to hand out candy at Halloween. Eat a pizza already!

  14. By amy
    On April 17, 2012 at

    Geeez, you people are brutal! No one asked about her hands…..

  15. By TxGal
    On April 17, 2012 at

    Her hands remind me of Madonna’s. Not a good compliment. Too bad for having an expensive ring her hands do not compliment the ring.

  16. By rb
    On April 17, 2012 at

    Beautiful..so classy looking not gawdy

  17. By Nina
    On April 17, 2012 at

    Angelina is so bony and so tattooed that any magnificent piece of jewelry, be it a ring, bracelet, or necklace, would look terrible on her. The first thing I thought when I saw the ring was that it’s a stone on top of an eternity band. Nice concept, Brad! I think the ring is pretty, but the cut of the stones is not my personal taste. She is just so weird that it’s hard to believe she snagged a nice guy like Brad. But I wish them well; they have some beautiful children.

  18. By Walt Cliff
    On April 17, 2012 at

    Wouldn’t it be a little bit difficult to wear something of this value to a village with starving children?

    Can’t you see one of the children’s tiny little fingers touch the ring and marvel at how pretty it is? Wouldn’t it be ethically wrong to wear something that pricy and know that it could feed everyone in your village for a long time?

  19. By Kitty
    On April 17, 2012 at

    I don’t like it, either. And she really does need to put on some weight.

  20. By Eva
    On April 17, 2012 at

    I think the ring is beautiful but it doesn’t really matter what we think. Brad designed is specifically for Angie and that is what makes it special for them. In regards to people complaining about how much they spent on it, you are not taking into consideration how much money they donate each year and how much time they spend working for their charities. Aren’t they allowed to spend some of their hard-earned money on nice things for themselves? Why do they have to be criticized for enjoying some of their money?

  21. By Sir Justin Ross
    On April 17, 2012 at

    Lucky lovely lady is so worth it…She is the most giving person in the world and they are really good together.

  22. By Christine India
    On April 17, 2012 at

    Even though these two employ nannies, maids, cooks, secretaries, etc., Angie is always grabbing on to their grubby little hands. Methinks the $1 million bauble will stay mostly in a safe and she will have a fabulous copy made to wear, except when she is on the red carpet or at a movie premiere. This is what Eliz Taylor and many others did. Most would not be able to tell the real one from a fabulous fake anyway; experts can make it look like the real mccoy.

  23. By funky booty
    On April 17, 2012 at

    India for your information. Her ring was only $200,000. Okay?

  24. By margie
    On April 23, 2012 at

    Horrible waste of a good diamond. They are supposed to sparkle and an emerald cut minimizes the sparkle. A white sapphire or a colored stone could have accomplished the same thing.

  25. By lam
    On April 24, 2012 at

    The ring to me is emotionless.

    I think they were going to get engaged anyway but I believe it was announced now as part of damage control for the leg incident.

    Does anyone else think that Angelinas frame is significant for some internal issue. Something is not right here.

  26. By icon package
    On September 17, 2012 at

    It is good idea.

    P.S. Please review icons

26 Responses to “ANGELINA’S RING WAS WORTH WAITING A YEAR FOR”




XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant Janet Charlton's Hollywood a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate comments will be removed at admin's discretion.

Follow Janet


blog advertising is good for you

Categories

Custom Search
© 2006-2012. All rights reserved. Janet Charlton's Hollywood.
Web Development by Strange, Funny, Weird, Dark | Private Policy

blog advertising is good for you

NEW UPDATE CHECK IT OUT - HOLLYWOOD WHODUNIT!

  • HOLLYWOOD WHODUNIT: LOOK WHO’S NOT TALKING ABOUT HARVEY WEINSTEIN !
    |

    We love every one of Harvey Weinstein’s female accusers – but what about the actresses who AREN’T talking? One actress who won an Oscar in the 90’s has been CONSPICUOUSLY SILENT about the casting couch scandal. It’s because SHE has had a long-term “arrangement” with Harvey in which she traded sex for showbiz favors and it must have been awful, but her career prospered. Now this A-lister is horrified at the prospect of being found out! And, guess what – she’s NOT the only one who’s conspicuously silent!
    Any guesses?

    Save

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  • RSSArchive for NEW UPDATE CHECK IT OUT - HOLLYWOOD WHODUNIT! »

Janet Charlton’s Hollywood Blog Archives

Previously Posted Items

December 2017
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031