ANOTHER KARDASHIAN TAKES HER CLOTHES OFF

spl66445_010_khloe.jpg
Photo Credit: Splash News

These Kardashian girls are not as smart as they look. Khloe Kardashian just unveiled her “Fur? I’d Rather Go Naked” billboard for PETA on Melrose Avenue. Granted, it’s huge, and it’s a very flattering photo (especially compared to the live subject) but that’s no excuse for aligning yourself with the cultish “animal rights” organization.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Posted by hoodlum on December 10, 2008

There are 24 Comments.  TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK!

24 Comments so far

  1. By Anonymous
    On December 10, 2008 at

    Janet, maybe she truly does not believe in harming animals. And for all their faults PETA does keep the subject of animal cruelty at the forefront of the news.

  2. By Christine
    On December 10, 2008 at

    This is a great picture for an amazing cause!!!

  3. By Anonymous
    On December 10, 2008 at

    She wishes she had a tiny waist like that, and I doubt her real rear end looks that perfect.

  4. By Kattitude
    On December 10, 2008 at

    Photoshop really is an amazing tool.

  5. By Anonymous
    On December 10, 2008 at

    Janet. You really disappoint me. Have you no compassion? Whether you like or dislike PETA – those furs come from CRUEL industries that torture animals their ENTIRE doomed lives only to be brutally and painfully killed so self-important and insecure idiots like these two can “show off”. Why don’t you go get stuffed in a tiny hot cage and get scalped alive and see how you like it so dumbass meanies like these two can make your scalp into a tote bag. God – get a soul woman. Animals don’t need “rights” – they just need basic kindness. You make me want to cry when you post callous stuff like this.

  6. By Anonymous
    On December 10, 2008 at

    Janet. You really disappoint me. Have you no compassion? Whether you like or dislike PETA – those furs come from CRUEL industries that torture animals their ENTIRE doomed lives only to be brutally and painfully killed so self-important and insecure idiots like these two can “show off”. Why don’t you go get stuffed in a tiny hot cage and get scalped alive and see how you like it so dumbass meanies like these two can make your scalp into a tote bag. God – get a soul woman. Animals don’t need “rights” – they just need basic kindness. You make me want to cry when you post callous stuff like this.

  7. By Anonymous
    On December 10, 2008 at

    Yes some of the PETA people can be over the top, but at least they care about something other than themselves, like the Kardashian whores

  8. By Anonymous
    On December 10, 2008 at

    Yes some of the PETA people can be over the top, but at least they care about something other than themselves, unlike the Kardashian whores

  9. By Anonymous
    On December 10, 2008 at

    The unattractive Mother who’s on that Insider show has nothing to be proud of with her skank daughters!

  10. By anonTWO
    On December 10, 2008 at

    that is one big girl- oof!

  11. By Reta
    On December 11, 2008 at

    That picture looks NOTHING like the real girl!! She’s a huge cow and you can tell by the real girl standing in front of the pic how fake this picture is…isn’t she embarrassed to have had to have it faked that much to be acceptable?

  12. By Strom
    On December 11, 2008 at

    More interesting would be the picture of RJ with his meat up Kim’s caboose, like in the movie, and Reggie B looking on.

  13. By gerard Vandenberg
    On December 11, 2008 at

    “Surfing” on the wave of kim’s success?

  14. By j
    On December 11, 2008 at

    Janet,
    I object to calling PETA a cultish animal rights group. While some of they sometimes go over the top in their actions, their heart is in the right place. And because people object to cruelty to animals and support PETA, doesn’t mean that they belong to cult. I agree with the above comment – no matter what your feelings are about PETA, wearing fur is cruel, selfish, and barbaric (and declasse).
    Also, I read your column for gossip and am sick of the political and social opinions that you’ve been throwing into it, particularly since many of them are so misinformed (the ridiculous Habit for Humanity criticism, for exammple). Stick to what you know – gossip.

  15. By Anonymous
    On December 11, 2008 at

    Even with the Photoshopping, she still looks like a giant Ewok.

  16. By Anonymous
    On December 11, 2008 at

    she should of worn a black bra under her see through top. The bra she has on doesn’t work. I wish someone would photoshop me!

  17. By Tinder from Down Under
    On December 11, 2008 at

    Janet your blog is superior to other “celebrity” blogs and it is the only one I look at buuuut what is with your judgement of PETA being “cultish”? It’s been fun looking at your blog but as of today – tootaloo!

  18. By J-9
    On December 11, 2008 at

    I have seen IT ALL!!!!!!!!!!
    This family has NO SHAME. NONE.

  19. By Anonymous
    On December 11, 2008 at

    Once again, Janet reveals how incredible stupidity and ass-kissery.

  20. By Kittee Kattee
    On December 11, 2008 at

    Yo, Khloe, those suede boots you’re wearing? Betcha they’ve got leather soles, too. Not much different than wearing fur, is it, honey?
    ^..^

  21. By Anonymous
    On December 13, 2008 at

    I trust everyone hear criticising fur is also a staunch vegan otherwise its just laughable hypocrisy. And no leather or suede items on them or in the house. Or…. well the list just goes on and on….

  22. By sasha
    On December 13, 2008 at

    I’ve heard that “if you wear anything leather you have no right to care about animals” argument so many times it makes me sick. And it’s always given in a smug tone from someone who doesn’t do one thing in their lives to help animals.
    Those of us who do care about animals aren’t perfect and we don’t claim to be. Living in today’s world with so many animal products everywhere you turn it’s hard to avoid it 100 percent. If anything, that’s MORE reason to keep animals in mind and think of their needs whenever possible, not less. It’s the effort toward the animals that counts, not giving up because of having a pair of leather shoes in the closet. We could all try to be compassionate and help each other protect innocent animals, not turn on each other and try to ridicule people out of even trying to help.

  23. By Anonymous
    On December 16, 2008 at

    Sasha the argument is not that “if you wear leather you have no right to care about animals” , just that you have no right to differentiate between your own consumption of animals and those of others and appointing yourself as a god given judge of where it stops and starts that conveninently fits around your own lifestyle. Moron of the first order if you are unable to see that simple concept.

  24. By Anonymous
    On December 16, 2008 at

    I’m not suprised Sasha gets “sick” everytime she hears that argument – it really pinpoints her in an awkward place. Fur is an animal hide. Leather is an animal hide. You can’t really go tying yourself in ethical knots to make out there is a difference and that one is approved over the other on the basis that it’s more popular.
    Give them the power of speech and I guess animals would have have quite a few pithy things to say about your weird grasp of ethics and logic, that its ok to have leather in your closet because its just so darn difficult to avoid animal products. “not giving up because of having a pair of leather shoes in the closet” ROTFL. Spoken like a true brave Hollywood style liberal. Would make a great acceptance speech.

24 Responses to “ANOTHER KARDASHIAN TAKES HER CLOTHES OFF”




XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant Janet Charlton's Hollywood a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate comments will be removed at admin's discretion.

Follow Janet


blog advertising is good for you

Categories

Custom Search
© 2006-2012. All rights reserved. Janet Charlton's Hollywood.
Web Development by Strange, Funny, Weird, Dark | Private Policy

blog advertising is good for you
  • HOLD ONTO YOUR PANTIES, WE HAVE A DOUBLE DOSE OF GAYNESS TODAY! TWO HOLLYWOOD WHODUNITS!
    |

    BLIND_ITEM_NEW_#CUT

    This bad boy seems to have calmed down since he got serious about his former pornstar girlfriend and he has his friends wondering WHY. What’s so special about HER? We hear she keeps him satisfied by supplying her MALE porn costars for his entertainment. The bad boy pays each guy $5000 per visit so they are highly motivated to make him happy. It’s a family affair – the girlfriend watches while the bad boy fiddles around with the guys!

    READ MORE!

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  • RSSArchive

Hottest Movies This Week!

Janet Charlton’s Hollywood Blog Archives

Previously Posted Items

May 2017
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031