ASHLEY AND MARY-KATE OLSEN: DOUBLE-OH-SEVEN

double-oh-seven.jpgIntroducing the new Bond Girls: Mary Kate and Ashley Olsen! One of the producers (who happens to be a female) of Daniel Craig’s next James Bond movie is very impressed with Ashley and Mary-Kate and really wants them in the 22nd 007 movie scheduled to start filming in 2008. The Olsens would be the first set of Bond twins. The producer is making the offer as appealing to the girls as possible – there will be no nudity or sex scenes. And the twins will play good girls – not villains. (ER’s Goran Visnjic is set to play a villain) The Olsens are seriously considering the offer. In the photo above, we’ve taken the liberty of morphing the twins photos with Bond girl Ursula Andress to give you a preview of what’s to come.

Posted by Janet on May 15, 2007

There are 51 Comments.  TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK!

51 Comments so far

  1. By Bev
    On May 16, 2007 at

    Bond girls that scarf n barf.How modern.

  2. By Anonymous
    On May 16, 2007 at

    I think it would be great

  3. By Anonymous
    On May 16, 2007 at

    they are not serious, are they? lollipop sticks cannot exude sex appeal.

  4. By Anonymous
    On May 16, 2007 at

    Finally they look healthy!

  5. By Anonymous
    On May 16, 2007 at

    This has to be a joke!

  6. By Anonymous
    On May 16, 2007 at

    uuuggghhhh, what a waste.
    I cant think who would be the perfect compliment to the very YUMMY Daniel Craig’s Bond…..i am so sick of the halle berry, jessica beil, jessica alba…

  7. By GEETZ
    On May 16, 2007 at

    to the previous 3 post – itz….GET A NEW LIFE w/o your TIRED BITTERNESS!!!!

  8. By Anonymous
    On May 16, 2007 at

    GOOD GRIEF…SAY IT ISN’T SO…

  9. By West Coastian
    On May 16, 2007 at

    I just can’t wrap my head around them doing adult movies. Old shows dies hard. :-)

  10. By Anonymous
    On May 16, 2007 at

    They better start eating at least a sandwich everyday. Bobblehead on a toothpick is not sexy. Good girl OR bad girl.
    There are some hotter twins somewhere in this world that they can use instead.

  11. By Anonymous
    On May 16, 2007 at

    I could totally see this. Bond wants to attract a younger audience. That explains it.

  12. By Anonymous
    On May 16, 2007 at

    but who are the fans of these two aline looking children?

  13. By Anonymous
    On May 16, 2007 at

    I just threw up a little in my mouth

  14. By Anonymous
    On May 16, 2007 at

    I just threw up a little in my mouth

  15. By Anonymous
    On May 16, 2007 at

    Daniel’s steely blue eyes alone would snap those two in half. NEXT……

  16. By Anonymous
    On May 16, 2007 at

    Daniel’s steely blue eyes alone would snap those two in half. NEXT……

  17. By Anonymous
    On May 17, 2007 at

    These two are NOT Bond girls!

  18. By KAT
    On May 17, 2007 at

    ANOREXIC, MONKEY FACED,
    GREAZY HAIRED “BOND GIRLS”!
    WHAT WILL BE NEXT?

  19. By Anonymous
    On May 17, 2007 at

    Just goes to show you that many in Hollyweird really do not know talent. IF they end up using these two ugly and untalented smurfs, they will not only ruin the movie but effectively make Bond a joke.

  20. By Anonymous
    On May 17, 2007 at

    sex is not what sells today,sultry and mysterious is now on the agenda.
    bulldozer

  21. By Anonymous
    On May 17, 2007 at

    Why! Why! Why! BOND GIRLS ARE HOT AND SEXY!!!! NOT UGLY!!

  22. By Anonymous
    On May 17, 2007 at

    The bond girl should be a reagular person. She shouldn’t be a so call Hollywood star.

  23. By Anonymous
    On May 17, 2007 at

    The bond girl should be a reagular person. She shouldn’t be a so call Hollywood star.

  24. By Anonymous
    On May 17, 2007 at

    I think that this would be a great addition to the Bond franchise. For once, they would use a bond girl that was actually thin.

  25. By Anonymous
    On May 17, 2007 at

    it would be terrible. the girls may be “hollywood stars” but i havent seen them make a decent movie- ever. not only can they not act; they are no where close to what a bond girl should be like. that would be the end of bond.

  26. By Anonymous
    On May 17, 2007 at

    I like the idea.
    Watch them grow up!
    They have kept a low profile
    unlike Paris, Lohan, Britney.
    If that is them in photo,
    they do look good.
    Go for it Olsens!

  27. By Anonymous
    On May 17, 2007 at

    I like the idea.
    Watch them grow up!
    They have kept a low profile
    unlike Paris, Lohan, Britney.
    If that is them in photo,
    they do look good.
    Go for it Olsens!

  28. By Anonymous
    On May 17, 2007 at

    Lets get real bond girls. please please please not them

  29. By Anonymous
    On May 17, 2007 at

    what janet charlton will say to be noticed. i guess the green hair is no longer working?

  30. By M Martin
    On May 17, 2007 at

    GIVE ME A BREAK !!!!

  31. By G Edwards
    On May 17, 2007 at

    Barfff !!

  32. By Gary Hooks Woodbridge Vrginia
    On May 17, 2007 at

    If the want to keep killing the franchise this could be the item that will make Sean, Roger,Ian and John Gardener all roll over after death

  33. By Gary Hooks Woodbridge Vrginia
    On May 17, 2007 at

    If the want to keep killing the franchise this could be the item that will make Sean, Roger,Ian and John Gardener all roll over after death

  34. By Anonymous
    On May 17, 2007 at

    Isn’t it amazing what an airbrush can do to a photo?

  35. By Anonymous
    On May 17, 2007 at

    Bond girls ought to be sexy. Calling these two sexy is like calling Paris Hilton an actress. Are the prerequesites having to go through therapy or rehab?

  36. By Anonymous
    On May 17, 2007 at

    I like it! The younger folks will get to know Bond and I would like to see the girls in something serious and produced well for once.

  37. By Anonymous
    On May 17, 2007 at

    Oh geeze. This HAS to be a joke. Who would actually go to see it with these two in it?

  38. By Anonymous
    On May 17, 2007 at

    Will they be the shortest bond girls ever? Interesting, midget bond girls…

  39. By Anonymous
    On May 17, 2007 at

    They could be Pussy Galores long lost neices….minus the good looks, and tits, and talent,,,,,er,,and sexy voice,,,shapely figures,,,,intelligence,,,,,,crap….nevermind.

  40. By Anonymous
    On May 17, 2007 at

    rrrright….what is this? 007 and the troll contingency. what’s next britney spears portraying mother teresa?

  41. By Anonymous
    On May 17, 2007 at

    my original post was edited….so much for real opinions on this board. More like what she wants you to read.

  42. By Anonymous
    On May 17, 2007 at

    Wow, what a great way to convince me to not watch the film.
    Can’t be true though, surely the producers can’t be that stupid.
    Got to be Olsen publicist trying to make out like they’re serious actors.

  43. By Anonymous
    On May 18, 2007 at

    Janet this is nonsense. Stop making up lies about a respectful series you have no clue about.

  44. By ella
    On May 18, 2007 at

    janet, another blog, Dlisted gave you credit the other day for breaking this story…i think it was for this one, anyhow..i wasnt sure if you knew. ;o)

  45. By Anonymous
    On May 19, 2007 at

    I like that ! It’s original and they’re very good actress and beautifuls

  46. By Sunseeds777
    On May 19, 2007 at

    Give them both a hair makeover…
    I mean, make their hair look like Shakira’s, this will turn those two ladies into foxes over night as that straight hair is so boring.

  47. By Anonymous
    On May 19, 2007 at

    Too bad it’s another rumor started by Ms Charlatan that turned out to be false.

  48. By Toby101
    On May 19, 2007 at

    may it never happen. Someone says it’s false, but you never know, and if it happens, i’ll never going to see that movie, even if it was the best Bond Movie ever.

  49. By Anonymous
    On May 19, 2007 at

    JANET CHARLTON IS A COMPULSIVE LIAR. WHY WOULD BARBARA BROCCOLI (ONE OF THE PRODUCERS) EVER WANT NO-TALENT ASS-CLOWNS LIKE THE OLSEN TWINS IN A BOND FILM? BOND IS TOO GOOD FOR SHITTY ACTRESSES LIKE THEM.

  50. By Anonymous
    On September 19, 2007 at

    It’s so hard to watch the Full House series, and compare the sweet innocent little girls with these hardcore messed up adults.

  51. By Anonymous
    On September 28, 2007 at

    eeewwww

51 Responses to “ASHLEY AND MARY-KATE OLSEN: DOUBLE-OH-SEVEN”




XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant Janet Charlton's Hollywood a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate comments will be removed at admin's discretion.

Follow Janet


blog advertising is good for you

Categories

Custom Search
© 2006-2012. All rights reserved. Janet Charlton's Hollywood.
Web Development by Strange, Funny, Weird, Dark | Private Policy

blog advertising is good for you
  • HOLD ONTO YOUR PANTIES, WE HAVE A DOUBLE DOSE OF GAYNESS TODAY! TWO HOLLYWOOD WHODUNITS!
    |

    BLIND_ITEM_NEW_#CUT

    This bad boy seems to have calmed down since he got serious about his former pornstar girlfriend and he has his friends wondering WHY. What’s so special about HER? We hear she keeps him satisfied by supplying her MALE porn costars for his entertainment. The bad boy pays each guy $5000 per visit so they are highly motivated to make him happy. It’s a family affair – the girlfriend watches while the bad boy fiddles around with the guys!

    READ MORE!

  • RSSArchive

Hottest Movies This Week!

Janet Charlton’s Hollywood Blog Archives

Previously Posted Items

January 2017
M T W T F S S
« Dec    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031