Lately the amply proportioned Kardashians have been frequently flaunting the trendy color nude, but they’re doing it all wrong. They wear the color in garments far too tight and sometimes without underwear. If Kim and Khloe DO wear undergarments, they serve to push up all their flesh into the low cut bustline. And you can IMAGINE what the rear view looks like. Pictured here is model Gigi Hadid scurrying to a NY meeting in a fetching flesh colored dress and heels to match. She gives the color class instead of vulgarity.
Photo Credit: AKM-GSI
The first ad for Lady Gaga’s new black perfume, Fame, was tweeted by you-know-who and it’s a doozy. Photographer Steven Klein snapped nude Gaga in repose like a mountain, being climbed all over by tiny muscular men in black masks and black gloves. She promised her fans that she mixed some of her blood into the first batch of perfume and as a result it contains her DNA. The scent is black in the bottle, but when sprayed on the body it becomes invisible. Gaga says it smells like “an expensive hooker.”
Photo via: Starcasm.net
Photo Credit: Pacific Coast News
Charmed star and former Marilyn Manson consort, Rose McGowan knows how to get attention. She nonchalantly walked around Paris shopping with a friend, and all heads turned in her direction because she was wearing a formfitting nude colored top. Indie actress Rose has two depressing movies in the works: The Bell Jar, and The Tell-Tale Heart.
Japan has SOME sense of humor. Supposedly, these are not girls with their underwear showing- they are prints on the skirts that make it LOOK like panties are visible! Is it possible this is all an optical illusion? It’s claimed that no skin or underpants are really showing, but it is very startling. Trick photography notwithstanding, this could definitely become a hazard to ogling drivers. We wonder who would be the first to sport this look in Hollywood? Child bride Courtney Stodden perhaps?
Twenty years ago we were turned OFF by Demi Moore’s nude and pregnant cover of Vanity Fair. Yet it seemed to open the doors for every pregnant celebrity to flaunt their expectant bellies and angelic faces on various magazine covers. Most recently we had to endure seeing Jessica Simpson on the cover of Elle. Pregnancy does not become her – she looks enormous and uncomfortable with her clothes ON. Apparently such covers are circulation boosters – but we want to know WHO enjoys looking at them? Your comments are welcome!
How come every time a female celebrity’s phone is hacked, it just happens to have nude photos on it? Not long ago, it was “Gossip Girl” Blake Lively, Mila Kunis, Scarlett Johansson – and most recently, Christina Hendricks and Olivia Munn. (above) The first thing the hacked actresses do is fall all over themselves, claiming the nude photos are NOT HER! We’ve heard that before. What boggles the mind is the fact that actresses of normal intelligence are dumb enough to HAVE nudie photos on their phones. And they seem to make it awfully easy to get hacked by taking no precautions. Police, with many better things to do, are assigned to “investigate.” Memo to hacked actresses: you’ll get no sympathy from us.
Photo Credit: Pacific Coast News
Keira Knightley’s musician boyfriend James Righton (The Klaxons) looks really young but it turns out he’s 28, and a year older than Keira. They were photographed together in London celebrating the release of her movie “A Dangerous Method.” Keira has admitted it took a few shots of vodka before director David Cronenberg could persuade her to do the nude scenes in the film, but we think she really overacted with many histrionics in all her scenes, vodka notwithstanding.
The FBI is investigating hackers who stole x-rated nude photos from Scarlett Johansson’s cell phone. Excuse us, but is this really an FBI matter? Somehow we imagined the FBI as working on assignments more important to the country. Would they be as involved if an ordinary Joe’s phone had been hacked and HIS not–so-sexy photos stolen? If YOUR cell phone were hacked, would you call the FBI? A private investigator, at most. So THIS is where our taxpayer dollars are going. Surely the Feds have more important things to do. And Scarlett should know better than to have nude photos of her private parts on her phone.
Playgirl gave up the pretense of being aimed at women who like to look at naked men a long time ago – now the magazine is full-out directed at the gay “hot studs” audience. The publication seems rather desperate for publicity because they keep making extravagant offers to B list celebrities to take it all off, knowing in advance what the answer is. Jon Gosselin was insulted by their $20,000 offer and Jersey Shore’s Vinny turned up his nose at $30,000. The magazine supposedly offered Glee’s Mark Salling $100,000 – only because they were sure he’d turn it down. We wonder what Kim’s brother Rob Kardashian thought about his $45,000 offer – and whether his agent/mom Kris tried to get a better deal. Nobody really knows how much Levi Johnston was actually paid for his semi-nudes because both sides exaggerate.
Britney Spears’ former bodyguard Fernando Flores, who’s suing her for sexual harassment, is licking his chops at the prospect of revealing all her dirty little secrets in civil court where we all can learn every lurid detail. Of course, HER people are begging the judge to move the case to probate court for privacy. There’s no decision yet, but hopefully the judge will rule our way because we do find Brit’s nudism and seduction attempts very entertaining.