Photo Credit: Buzz Foto

Fashion Week in New York is always revealing. Kim and Kourtney Kardashian showed up looking like two guests at “My Big Fat Greek Wedding.” We can only assume they were doing some struggling designer a favor by wearing his clothes. Sarah Jessica Parker, on the other hand, did not disappoint. She has a huge fashion reputation to live up to, and she continues to succeed.


Posted by Janet on September 12, 2010

There are 17 Comments.  TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK!

17 Comments so far

  1. By Bettye Bluejay
    On September 12, 2010 at

    Kourtney’s hair and dress are reminiscent of an alien from Star Trek, The Next Generation.

  2. By captain america
    On September 12, 2010 at

    yup, agree.

  3. By SebastianCanada
    On September 12, 2010 at

    Not to be chavenistic about my generation, but SJP is of a demographic that was raised to have real class. She is not a trendoid, and knows something about art and design. The Kardashian girls are of the trailer trash generation.

  4. By Palermo
    On September 12, 2010 at

    Sarah definitely needs to start wearing long sleeves, she is pure Madonnaesque now, the Kardashians are far prettier

  5. By clementine
    On September 12, 2010 at

    Kardashian zombies—–D+

  6. By Reta
    On September 12, 2010 at

    Kourtney’s dress looks like it has 1980’s “Dallas” shoulder pads, and it too short and looks boxy on her short frame. Kim usually looks pretty good to me. This dress is okay, I like the skirt better than the top part. And BOTH girls need some lips. What’s up with wearing A bunch of dark eye make-up but then no lips?
    Sjp I’m pretty much just bored with in general. This dress in a bit too long, it appears to make her stomach look bulgy, and more old lady muscular arms to look at are NOT attractive. She also has one long string of hair that seems to have escaped the cutter or stylist and is dangling a few inches below the rest of her whole headful of hair. How odd! And her being pretty much known for hair!
    Also the K’s need necklaces. You’ve got the money girls, put on some bling!

  7. By Helena Handbasket
    On September 13, 2010 at

    It’s been suggested for some time… but now we’ve got proof… and it’s NOT just a hideous make-up job. Kim’s RUINED her once-beautiful face with God knows WHAT type of cosmetic surgery (perhaps a full-on facelift?)… no doubt about it!

  8. By cal
    On September 13, 2010 at

    Right you are Janet

  9. By Indy
    On September 13, 2010 at

    I guess you are right, Janet. Since SJP came on the scene first, she probably influenced the ‘K’s’ to wear those 5 inch $1000 heels. Slogging around in those things day in and day out will do a number on your lower back. And by now their bunions must be huuuge. Also, a big thumbs down to all three dresses AND to SJP’s Madonna arms.

  10. By Seriously?
    On September 13, 2010 at

    Sarah Jessica Parker is a lady. The Kardashians are cheap trash who parlayed Kim’s willingness to be videotaped being urinated on by Brandy’s brother into what passes for fame.

  11. By Lenny
    On September 13, 2010 at

    I love Kourtney because she seems real. Kim not so much, but I have agree with Seriously on 50% of that statement. But I think SJP is homely and doesn’t have the face to pull it out.

  12. By SebastianCanada
    On September 13, 2010 at

    The Kardashians appeal is their youth. That sort of asset is cheap – everyone has it as some point. SJP always had style, grace and composure. I remember a photo shoot she did with Graffiti magazine in the mid-eighties, with Robert Downey Jr. She glowed. I don’t find her homely – she is not cookie-cutter pretty, and that turns some people off.

  13. By SebastianCanada
    On September 13, 2010 at

    BTW, I think the obsession with youth is not because of the young, but people in their 30’s and 40’s who stupidly wasted their teens and twenties by being overly-mature, pompous and dour (I mean, who wears Lacoste, Kakis and penny-loafers in high school?). Now they are trying to live vicariously through the younger generations.

  14. By Natalie
    On September 13, 2010 at

    I agree with all the posters who point out the obvious: SJP is classy and is a celebrity because of her REAL work in film and television. She is a true star unlike the Kardashian sisters who are cheap tramps. They are so-called “famous” because of sex on tape and reality TV shows. I’d pick SJP over those Kardashian tramps any day of the week. I think SJP is attractive in an off-beat sort of way. She’s had her nose tweaked, that’s for sure, but she’s hasn’t molded her face to look like everyone else, which I admire.

  15. By CityGirl
    On September 13, 2010 at

    Those Kartrashian outfits put the HOME in homely! Well, if their ass & teets aren’t hanging out, I don’t think they know quite what to do.

    SJP does have that certain something…and that doesn’t include having a golden shower.

    On the other hand, the two sistahs need to go find another country to live cause they sure are an embarrassment to us.

  16. By Mel Zipskin
    On September 13, 2010 at

    The TrashCans just prove that money doesn’t buy class, and their 15 minutes of PORN STAR HIJINKS parlayed into a reality show career is ALMOST OVER.

    Kim your mother or you reads this. Look at the stats your brand is down. Plastic surgery victims who claim natural beauty are insulting as they are tacky. Kim has botox monthly!!


    Oh. SPJ looks very well, classy.

  17. By No fats
    On September 14, 2010 at

    Yes sjp certainly does look better in this dress but ppl forget all too quickly that pre sex and the city this woman was pure trash, she even wore a disgusting black dress to her own wedding. She was chronically on worst dressed lists and a looker she will never ne confused for. Those zombie arms and hands are disgusting she needs to incest in lady like white gloves to hide that crap!


XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant Janet Charlton's Hollywood a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate comments will be removed at admin's discretion.

Follow Janet

blog advertising is good for you


Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 67108864 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 35 bytes) in /home/content/32/8412132/html/wp-includes/taxonomy.php on line 3317