Britney Spears fans, and maybe some people not so fond of her, are in a tizzy, claiming she used a body double for some of her dance moves in this “Till the World Ends” promo. (Lip synching isn’t ENOUGH?) They not only accuse Britney’s female choreographer of slapping on a wig to double for some intricate steps, but some insist the stand-in looks like a GUY. What do YOU think?

Posted by Janet on April 9, 2011

There are 24 Comments.  TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK!

24 Comments so far

  1. By Mario Dyne
    On April 9, 2011 at

    There is not one shot of Britney dancing where you can’t see her face. It’s clearly her with great editing. This blog is stupid.

  2. By frank
    On April 9, 2011 at

    @Mario Dyne

    Agreed. Why don’t they leave this girl alone. WHERE is the ‘intricate’ dancing in this video that this girl, a DANCER primarily, is not capable?

  3. By Pathetic
    On April 9, 2011 at

    It doesn’t matter Janet, she could fart into the microphone and her stupid sycophantic fans would think it was great. America is full of retards who don’t know what real talent is.

  4. By The American
    On April 9, 2011 at

    she even has a “Double” for shitting sometimes!!!

  5. By Bluejay
    On April 9, 2011 at

    Really, does anyone care?

  6. By Patrick
    On April 9, 2011 at

    I’m still traumatized from watching just half of that nasty meat video.
    You assholes that made that video.
    The blood drips from my fangs. Medium rare/rare, please. fuck.
    No way I’m watching the American Express video.
    Lived that horror show already.

  7. By Strom
    On April 10, 2011 at

    Maybe she has learned her lesson, and at least hasn’t gone Kardashaian by going black!

  8. By pj
    On April 10, 2011 at

    Intricate dance steps? In this video? It’s all Britney.

  9. By Spacelamb
    On April 10, 2011 at

    Since when did bobbing up and down constitute “intricate steps”? I’m no Britney fanatic but the woman has always been able to dance, and now the haters are trying to take even that from her? Please.

  10. By Seriously?
    On April 10, 2011 at

    If the producers used a dance double, they should demand their money back. There was no real dancing by Britney in that video. Her feet barely left the floor. The most moving she did was marching in place and crossing her arms.
    Those of you with kids at home will be reminded of an iCarly episode where the kids have to make a music video with a brain-dead former pop star (very clearly modeled on Britney) and they do the same thing-surround her with real dancers and make sure she never has to actually dance.

  11. By Mark
    On April 10, 2011 at

    If Britney could actually do all those acrobatics, they’d be showing her face. If they’re smart, they’ll say that isn’t Britney and we were never meant to think it was. There are other dancers with her in one of the silhouetted shots, and they should say it’s one of them. Which it probably is.

  12. By Palermo
    On April 10, 2011 at

    She was just out here in SF for a concert, she lip synched three songs and all critics said she looked at her heaviest weight and was awful. I watched about three seconds of that video without sound and had to stop it, the whole thing was gross. Britney’s time has passed, let’s face it and move on. And she was never a good singer, all she had going for her were her looks and those seem to be gone.

  13. By joanie
    On April 10, 2011 at

    I didn’t see any intricate dance steps. I saw softcore porn.

  14. By Alpha Femme
    On April 10, 2011 at

    There is def some trickery going on here. The fact that close-ups last less than a blink of an eye prove it. If she could move or dance she would want that camera on her longer than that. Think Justin Timberlake for example…he can dance and the camera always stays on him 90% of time and dancers get 10%. In Britney’s case is the other way around. I think it’s her most of the time but heavily edited because the girl can’t do it. C’mon haters or lovers, that girl is brain dead and a puppet. Just watch her live ‘performances’ of late.
    BTW I had to turn of the sound to watch it… what an elaborate diarrhea her ‘music’ is. Feel kinda sorry for her, she’s dead puppet.

  15. By Rick
    On April 10, 2011 at

    Puzzling. I studied the video intently with the sound off. A few observations: I did not see a single ‘intricate’ dance move. 95% of Britney’s movements consisted of bobbing to the beat with very little actual dancing, except for the backup dancers. Perhaps one of those backup dancers is being mistaken for Britney, but even that’s a stretch.

  16. By Muffin top!!
    On April 10, 2011 at

    Nothing would suprise me with Brit Brit. Carson Daly recently said that Brit’s handlers even refused to let her do a live interview. That is some serious pupeteering.

    The girl is one of the biggest optical illusion/fraud performers of all time. She is a “Ca$h Cow” for all the leeches on the BS totem pole!!

    This being said, I am sure she is a nice young lady. Just a prisoner of her own fame and fortune.

  17. By Rick
    On April 10, 2011 at

    btw, quickly changing frame sequences is a production technique developed over the last decade or so to add the illusion of more movement than is actually happening. It doesn’t bother me much for things like music videos, but drives me crazy at times when they do it for regular programming because it mimics neurotic and that’s annoying to watch for any length of time.

  18. By dee cee
    On April 10, 2011 at

    It’s obvious Britney dressed like herself as a male dance double to see if we got it, and yay you win. She’s tricky that way. : }

  19. By Walt Cliff
    On April 10, 2011 at

    I’ve watched the video with the sound off over and over and over again.

    What was the question? (insert devilish smile)

  20. By frank
    On April 10, 2011 at


    Haha. Don’t kid yourself. Brit HAS gone black before, and enjoyed herself. :) Just wasn’t a big publicity story…

  21. By Alpha Femme
    On April 10, 2011 at

    C’ mon guys… what’s wrong with liking black guys? It’s 21st century, here in Canada everyone is mixed. Asian chicks like white boys, white boys like East Indian girls and their kids look great. Stop this stupid racism and prejudice. Leave people to their own preferences. What’s next? Censoring Internet? Little Red book in every classroom and we all salute the Great Chairman? We are free citizens, let’s keep it that way starting behind the closed doors.

  22. By Alpha Femme
    On April 11, 2011 at

  23. By Mel Zipskin
    On April 13, 2011 at

    Doubles used no big whoop the girl is a shell dead eyes a cash cow doing the same shit she was at 17, poor little rich girl.

  24. By Christy
    On April 13, 2011 at

    It’s Britney and she looks good. Still doesn’t dance as fast and have as many moves as earlier days. Remember when she had knee surgery, wonder if it fully recovered? That would make a difference.


XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant Janet Charlton's Hollywood a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate comments will be removed at admin's discretion.

Follow Janet

blog advertising is good for you


Custom Search
© 2006-2012. All rights reserved. Janet Charlton's Hollywood.
Web Development by Strange, Funny, Weird, Dark | Private Policy

blog advertising is good for you


    This bad boy seems to have calmed down since he got serious about his former pornstar girlfriend and he has his friends wondering WHY. What’s so special about HER? We hear she keeps him satisfied by supplying her MALE porn costars for his entertainment. The bad boy pays each guy $5000 per visit so they are highly motivated to make him happy. It’s a family affair – the girlfriend watches while the bad boy fiddles around with the guys!


  • RSSArchive

Hottest Movies This Week!

Janet Charlton’s Hollywood Blog Archives

Previously Posted Items

October 2016
« Sep