JENNIFER ANISTON’S CUTE, BUT SHE’S NO BRIGITTE BARDOT

We still can’t believe this is Jennifer Aniston, Allure magazine must have the most amazing photoshop experts because we would have guessed this might be Jessica Alba with a blonde wig – anyone but Jennifer. Jen must have bleached her hair for the movie she’s been working on, Wanderlust. The photoshoot was supposedly inspired by Brigitte Bardot, but we think they missed the target. Jennifer looks better as herself.

Posted by Janet on January 18, 2011

There are 28 Comments.  TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK!

28 Comments so far

  1. By Walt Cliff
    On January 18, 2011 at

    She looks beautiful. I love bangs! I love the bangs on Jennifer (and on Sandra Bullock). It especially makes girls over 40 look a bit more youthful and sexy.

    I don’t think Jennifer Aniston tries to be anything but herself. She has plenty of money, can pick and choose her movies, she loves to travel, has good friends and is crazy about her dogs. I think she knows that she has it made.

  2. By Muffin top!!
    On January 18, 2011 at

    I know I will catch flack for saying this but this article is just another ploy to get the public to feel sorry for her. In the article she claims that her dogs keep her company when she is lonely. Whoa is me!! With all her money and ass kissing of other celebrities this statement cetainly seems to be a pity ploy. She does not have a reason to be lonely with all of her so called friends. She chooses to be single because it works better for her career and public image if she plays the lonely, done-wrong card. Time to give it up girl, the act is getting old.

    Where are her precious dogs when she is travelling to mexico by the way?

    This picture is definately “Ugly Step-sister-ish” if you ask me. I guess that is part of the reason people like/feel sorry for her. It is the fact that she got shafted in the looks department, definately!!

  3. By Walt Cliff
    On January 18, 2011 at

    I don’t feel sorry for Jennifer Aniston and I don’t ever recall a time when she wanted us to feel sorry for her. She had many many opportunities to trash her ex and his girlfriend but I never heard or read where she did. No one would have faulted her if she had. The point is she didn’t. She acted like a lady. I admire the way she and Sandra Bullock handled their divorces.

    Everyone has lonely times…..that’s perfectly human. Thank goodness I have my dogs for companionship. I would go nuts without them sometimes.

    Over the years, I have had people that worked behind the scenes (not actors) that said that Jennifer Aniston was always the one that spoke to them, remembered their names and would sit and chat with them in between tapings.

  4. By Denise
    On January 18, 2011 at

    She’s almost unrecognizable here, and I’m not sure I like the bangs. I think they’re a little heavy for her face. I always thought she came across as someone you’d like to have as one of your close girlfriends, to hang out, drink wine, bitch, laugh, etc.

  5. By strom
    On January 18, 2011 at

    Major photoshop but its a change and at least the chin isnt so featured.

    She should go to Europe for a while…maybe do UK stage or move to Hawaii and get out of the limelight and enjoy life and life will come to her yet. Why just be in the news for being screwed and dumped by someone as worthless as Mayer

  6. By Indy
    On January 18, 2011 at

    I think this is a huge joke (photoshopping). These are Angelina Jolie lips (and Jolie usually wore pale pink lipstick like this. Jennifer’s lips, especially the top one, are thin as a pencil. The nose and chin do not look to be photoshopped. And I’m still not convinced that is not a wig; it looks wiggy.

    BTW, she still hates Angelina Jolie; she knows she can never get a man, esp. a celeb, because they think she compares them to the great Pitt.

  7. By Indy
    On January 18, 2011 at

    Oops . Left off the ) after the words “pink lipstick like this”.

  8. By Bettye Bluejay
    On January 18, 2011 at

    Angelina seems to be losing it in the looks and gowns departments. She had a creepy aura about her on the red carpet, and that dress wasn’t so hot. So many women more beautiful, and better dressed.

  9. By Rita
    On January 18, 2011 at

    SEBASTIAN CANADA….I know you are still on here, under an assumed name.

  10. By Indy
    On January 18, 2011 at

    Bettye: I 100% agree; she looks kinda spaced out. I think it may be partly a mental and/or drugs issue; all the mags have picked up on her being way too thin, traveling way too much, never has a robust appetite, and much more….something’s gotta give. Jon Voight always maintained she was a little ‘off’, and why would he make this up.

  11. By Selene
    On January 18, 2011 at

    Wow what an awful picture….she definetely looks better when she’s just being herself…!

  12. By uncle bill
    On January 18, 2011 at

    please say it!!
    …….HERT 15 MINUTES OF FAME ARE OVER NOW.

  13. By Reta
    On January 18, 2011 at

    I like Jen a lot, but what I find strange about this pic of her is her nose and lips don’t look right. Don’t look like hers somehow. Perhaps Photoshopped into oblivion? I’m betting the hair is either a wig, or as suggested elsewhere, clip-in bangs. She still has a great body. I understand her comment about her dogs. If you’re a “dog person” you’ll get it. You don’t have to be lonely to have a very special connection with your pet. Dogs just seem to get people. It’s why we started domesticating them thousands of years ago. Sometimes I think they get us better than we get ourselves.

  14. By Gloria Goodman
    On January 19, 2011 at

    Every time she has a new movie coming out, she does a photo shoot with some nudity and a lot of air brushing! And the majority of the movies sink because she is a one note actress (and I use that term loosely). She does the same character over and over and it’s called Rachel!

    Enough already!

  15. By georgie
    On January 19, 2011 at

    Those might be clip on bangs, not sure, but I think she looks cute here. In general, she looks very good up close, except for some sun damage to her skin. I’m not a big fan of rom com movies and haven’t seen very many of hers, but she has done some good things on film, like the one with Clive Owen. Also, she is a very nice, considerate person. My husband has worked on 3 of her movies and she is lovely to everyone and very professional.

  16. By Rick
    On January 19, 2011 at

    Her movies in general are a bit too much on the WE side for my taste, but her stellar personality makes it impossible not to love her. As for this photo, she’s unrecognizable. I never would have guessed it was her.

  17. By Something Nice
    On January 19, 2011 at

    Nope.

  18. By Teddy
    On January 19, 2011 at

    I hope Annisten sues the magazine for this Photo Shop of horrors.

  19. By spinner
    On January 19, 2011 at

    Those are definitely clip-on bangs & I agree with you, Reta…something is way off about her nose & mouth. Looks like they dumped a load of powder on her face. We are used to seeing her sun-kissed with color. And what’s with the creepy stuffed animal?? WTF?? Do not like this photo shoot. She is unrecognizable. If this is what she thinks is going to change-up her looks, it is an epic fail.

  20. By Natalie
    On January 19, 2011 at

    Don’t much care for this look on Jennifer, either. I agree w/earlier poster about Angelina Jolie looking creepy on the Golden Globe red carpet. The green dress was just plain ugly in style and color. Also, did anyone find all that PDA with Brad Pitt at the dinner table a little overdone?

  21. By Sari
    On January 19, 2011 at

    I think she would make an awesome friend. She keeps everyone guessing why she has not found a man; who knows why, except her. I do think she fell hard for John Mayer, which did not turn out to be a good pick. I have to wonder with all these pregnancies popping up in Hollywood if she has any regrets. Dogs are fantastic therapy for loneliness.

  22. By MissEva
    On January 19, 2011 at

    This woman is about 20 years too old to try to look like an ingenue. She never was, is not now, and never will be sexy—or able to carry a movie! It would be great if she’d just do us all a favor and go away, with or without her dogs.

  23. By Muffin Top!!
    On January 19, 2011 at

    Rita, I agree with you SC is still perusing this site.

    Jus wanted to say in the nicest way possible. Janet that your picture up in the right corner kind of resembles Aniston in this photo. With you being much prettier of course!!

  24. By Village
    On January 19, 2011 at

    Does she know how old she is?

    I’m so frickin’ tried of Rachel Green!

    GO AWAY!!!!!

  25. By Christina
    On January 19, 2011 at

    From MissEva: “This woman is about 20 years too old to try to look like an ingenue.”

    Totally agree with this statement. Feels like she’s trying to channel Brooklyn Decker.

  26. By Anonymouth
    On January 20, 2011 at

    She’s a mayonnaise-on-white-bread sandwich with a side of mashed potatoes and a glass of skim milk.

    She doesn’t have relationships, she has photo-ops and movie promotional campaigns.

    Pound for pound, the most over-marketed, least talented movie actress in Hollywood.

    In other words, she was PERFECT for TV. :)

  27. By Liz
    On January 20, 2011 at

    What the hell is up with the fish mouth?

  28. By lindsay
    On April 15, 2013 at

    @ Gloria, I couldn’t have said it better myself! Jennifer aniston is a boring plain jane and a mediocre actress. she’s had maybe 2 or 3 movies that were hits in her WHOLE CAREER because just like you said, she’s incapable of playing anything other than Rachel and that character is still what she is most known for. she’s not respected as an actress AT ALL and she most certainly isn’t known as a great beauty. it’s amazing that she still gets work because your almost guaranteed a flop movie with her in it. (several critics have even called her box office poison) i don’t wish her any ill will but like so many others, i do wish she would just go away. also, why do these modern actresses keep doing photo shoots inspired by the glamourous women of yesteryear? women don’t look that way anymore. period. the women from the 30′s to the 60′s were just more womanly, glamourous and NATURALLY beautiful(meaning no fake boobs, noses, lips ect) the world will never see the likes of beauties like Marilyn Monroe, Jayne Mansfield, Rita Hayworth, Brigitte Bardot, Bettie Page, Elizabeth Taylor ect ever again.

28 Responses to “JENNIFER ANISTON’S CUTE, BUT SHE’S NO BRIGITTE BARDOT”




XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant Janet Charlton's Hollywood a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate comments will be removed at admin's discretion.

Follow Janet


blog advertising is good for you

Categories

Custom Search
© 2006-2012. All rights reserved. Janet Charlton's Hollywood.
Web Development by Strange, Funny, Weird, Dark | Private Policy

blog advertising is good for you
  • HOLD ONTO YOUR PANTIES, WE HAVE A DOUBLE DOSE OF GAYNESS TODAY! TWO HOLLYWOOD WHODUNITS!
    |

    BLIND_ITEM_NEW_#CUT

    This bad boy seems to have calmed down since he got serious about his former pornstar girlfriend and he has his friends wondering WHY. What’s so special about HER? We hear she keeps him satisfied by supplying her MALE porn costars for his entertainment. The bad boy pays each guy $5000 per visit so they are highly motivated to make him happy. It’s a family affair – the girlfriend watches while the bad boy fiddles around with the guys!

    READ MORE!

  • RSSArchive

Hottest Movies This Week!

Janet Charlton’s Hollywood Blog Archives

Previously Posted Items

October 2016
M T W T F S S
« Sep    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31