NICOLE KIDMAN AND KEITH URBAN SLIDE THROUGH LAX ALMOST UNNOTICED

Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban walked through LAX with a minimum of fuss, holding their sleepy and well-behaved little girls. Sunday, with the braids, turns 3 on July 4, and her little sister Faith is 5 months old. Nicole, 43, gave birth to Sunday, but Faith was born by “gestational carrier.” That is the term used when it is both parents’ biological child carried by a third person – a “surrogate” can have different parents.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Posted by Janet on May 25, 2011

There are 14 Comments.  TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK!

14 Comments so far

  1. By Walt Cliff
    On May 25, 2011 at

    Those little girls are just beautiful. The oldest looks just like daddy Keith. Urban has a reputation for being likable and always there for any charity concert.

    Kidman doesn’t seem very motherly to me although I hope she is. In my opinion, I think both children were born via “gestational carrier. Not that it’
    s a big deal but I don’t believe she was ever pregnant.

  2. By cal
    On May 25, 2011 at

    Walt I agree with you.

  3. By Denise
    On May 25, 2011 at

    Who wouldn’t notice those beautiful girls. And Keith’s not bad either.

  4. By Bluejay
    On May 25, 2011 at

    Why do you think the cruisemeister divorced her?

  5. By Mary Claire
    On May 25, 2011 at

    I think her contract with him was up, OR she could’nt reconcile with his evil Scientology beliefs, and left, or he divorced her for her opposition to joining the cult.

  6. By The American
    On May 25, 2011 at

    still thankful for avoiding tom cruise’s life.

  7. By pippa martins-st. onge
    On May 25, 2011 at

    I am convinced Kidman did not give birth to Sunday roast. She never looked pregnant in any of the photos taken during that time. She is not fertile. Rumours are also circulating about her Country Music Man cheating on her and using drugs again.

  8. By Reta
    On May 25, 2011 at

    What a beautiful and normal looking little family. I wish them the best and the babies look so pretty in their white dresses. I think Nicole treasures them with all her heart and appreciates having them. I think she may have been sad somewhat for not being able to carry the second one, but who knows what the reason was? There are many reasons a woman is given not to carry a baby, but her eggs can still be retrieved. I’ll bet she retrieved them way back at the beginning of meeting him, or maybe even when she was still single. No one will ever know. I just hope both children are healthy and happy as they seem to be so far and have a mommy and daddy there for them with love and support when they need them. In other words: a normal family life which is the best thing you can ever hope to have.

  9. By Patrick
    On May 26, 2011 at

    Lugging sleepy little potato’s. I miss that. A lot.

  10. By Natalie
    On May 26, 2011 at

    I wonder if Nicole has much contact with the children she adopted with Tom Cruise?

  11. By Indy
    On May 26, 2011 at

    Natalie, I read that she has little contact with the two adopted kids, as they are full-on into Scientology, and Nicole, of course, is not. So, since tiny Tom Hitler is the master in command here, I guess what I read is true.

  12. By Reta
    On May 26, 2011 at

    Patrick, I too am having withdrawals looking at this picture. I can easily recall my boys being this young, and different ages, but now that they tower over me and talk in deep man voices, it kind of freaks me out. My babies are gone for good I guess. But, boy were they cute little darlings!

  13. By Christine India
    On May 27, 2011 at

    Reta, that is so touching. BTW, I hope you are healing up nicely.

  14. By Lana
    On May 30, 2011 at

    Walt,

    Kidman was definitely pregnant with Sunday Rose. Look at this pic and tell me she didn’t look preggers: http://bit.ly/jjfFQ8

    She carried that child. The 2nd one she did not.

14 Responses to “NICOLE KIDMAN AND KEITH URBAN SLIDE THROUGH LAX ALMOST UNNOTICED”




XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant Janet Charlton's Hollywood a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate comments will be removed at admin's discretion.

Follow Janet


blog advertising is good for you

Categories

Custom Search
© 2006-2012. All rights reserved. Janet Charlton's Hollywood.
Web Development by Strange, Funny, Weird, Dark | Private Policy

blog advertising is good for you

NEW UPDATE CHECK IT OUT - HOLLYWOOD WHODUNIT!

  • HOLLYWOOD WHODUNIT: LOOK WHO’S NOT TALKING ABOUT HARVEY WEINSTEIN !
    |

    We love every one of Harvey Weinstein’s female accusers – but what about the actresses who AREN’T talking? One actress who won an Oscar in the 90’s has been CONSPICUOUSLY SILENT about the casting couch scandal. It’s because SHE has had a long-term “arrangement” with Harvey in which she traded sex for showbiz favors and it must have been awful, but her career prospered. Now this A-lister is horrified at the prospect of being found out! And, guess what – she’s NOT the only one who’s conspicuously silent!
    Any guesses?

    Save

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  • RSSArchive for NEW UPDATE CHECK IT OUT - HOLLYWOOD WHODUNIT! »

Janet Charlton’s Hollywood Blog Archives

Previously Posted Items

December 2017
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031