OOPS! KATE HUDSON FORGOT TO SUCK IT IN

katecutsplash.jpg
Photo Credit: Splash News

This picture of Kate Hudson is bound to get the “baby bump watchers” all riled up. (Who STARTED this fanatical bump-watching, anyway?) It’s getting so a girl can’t exhale or eat dessert without setting off alarms. As far as anyone knows, Kate is NOT expecting, but from now on she’ll be closely observed.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Posted by hoodlum on January 31, 2008

There are 30 Comments.  TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK!

30 Comments so far

  1. By Anonymous
    On January 31, 2008 at

    She has little to no taste in Fashion dear. That ugly dress doesn’t fit properly and shiny material is known to be unforgiving.

  2. By Art Chic
    On January 31, 2008 at

    Yeh that fabric is tacky and she DOES look preggers.
    OFF TOPIC:
    JCHA did you get my mail about the offensive ART CHIC stalker/troll/impersonator?
    If you find time to check you will see they are spamming this board under different names… note the Jason Davis thread, please.
    Please could you do something about it, do you have a moderator on this board?
    Thanks!

  3. By Sharon
    On January 31, 2008 at

    She should be the newest spokesperson for Jenny Craig!

  4. By Dayna
    On January 31, 2008 at

    WOW…not pretty. I actually only find her to be average looking. When visible those ears of her can keep her airborne.

  5. By Art Chic
    On January 31, 2008 at

    Girl I have that same dress and I look fab in it

  6. By gerard Vandenberg
    On January 31, 2008 at

    Damm you should have seen me at halloween as Diana Ross.I looked like a stuffed sausage

  7. By Bev
    On January 31, 2008 at

    This hag would NEVER have made it had her mom not been Goldie Hawn.Kate is a bore.Why do you think she hasnt had 1 hit movie in years?She needs to get her fat can to t.v. and make movies for lifetime.Shes a nothing,no class no style,snooze.

  8. By ho
    On January 31, 2008 at

    She is not a good actress at all. Almost Famous was a fluke. Fool’s Gold will tank also. It’s a new week, Kate, go find a new guy to hump.

  9. By Art Chic
    On January 31, 2008 at

    Hello lame azz TROLL @3:13. I have personally spoken to Janet Charlton about you impersonating I, the one and only ART CHIC.
    For all reading this I’m super busy won’t be posting for a couple of days so anyone posting as ART CHIC will be the impersonating troll.

  10. By Jerrie Sinefelt
    On January 31, 2008 at

    She does not have what you would call a really pretty face, ’tis just average. Always thought she was common-looking, she has no acting talent, and is clearly riding on Goldie’s coat-tails. I’ve seen better dresses at the 2nd hand thrift shops.

  11. By Anonymous
    On January 31, 2008 at

    Agreed!

  12. By Anonymous
    On January 31, 2008 at

    That is one of the ugliest dresses I have seen since an early nineties prom in NJ.

  13. By Mama Mia
    On January 31, 2008 at

    Her chest is flatter than my Gramma Sadie’s ironing board. Plus, she can’t act her way out of a paper bag and has never been photographed wearing anything nice. One year on the Red Carpet, her bony chest was concave and the dress looked like a Goodwill store reject. Blah and boring is she.

  14. By nina
    On January 31, 2008 at

    she is so unattractive. that hair, that face, that figure, that purse, the color of that dress, she has absolutely zero presence and zero personality- dishwater’s more interesting.

  15. By Anonymous
    On January 31, 2008 at

    lets stick to the facst, she is clearly pregnant, no one can suck in that much. shes 5months fat.

  16. By Oh, Gasp, oh, horrors
    On January 31, 2008 at

    Kate, go on the Maury Povich show; he’ll help you find who the daddy is; that is if you even care.

  17. By brian birchall, rancher
    On January 31, 2008 at

    kate looks lovely.

  18. By Anonymous
    On January 31, 2008 at

    You can blame braindead Bonnie Fuller for this constant “baby bump” obsession. Meanwhile, she ignores her cancer-stricken kid so she can attend the opening of an envelope.
    In fact, Janet, wasn’t Bonnie the one who axed your column from Star? Another example of how little she knows.

  19. By Uola Gabor
    On January 31, 2008 at

    My Dears.She looks like nothing other than a common scrub woman.In my days a True lady would have never left her house dressed in this fashion.Disgusting vulgar display.

  20. By My Dahlink
    On January 31, 2008 at

    A common scrub woman would turn down a free handout such as this, laughing loudly as she said ‘thanks, but no thanks’.

  21. By gerard Vandenberg
    On January 31, 2008 at

    You’re looking HOT like your mother used to do.
    BUT THE DRESS IS A MESS!!

  22. By Bev Art Schtick Vandenberg
    On January 31, 2008 at

    She’s a faggott!

  23. By Anonymous
    On February 1, 2008 at

    Not a flattering picture at all. Never cared for her “acting” either.

  24. By Anonymous
    On February 1, 2008 at

    7:17
    8:06
    8:45
    9:45
    Are all the same SPAMMING TROLL. Janet you should make us register/log in to prevent this sort of TROLL
    INVASION.

  25. By Anonymous
    On February 1, 2008 at

    this is the only message book/comments section on any site that i’ve gone to where people are crazy/obsessed about trolls. just ignore the comments if you don’t like them. why does it bother you so much…especially that Art person? just change your name. geez

  26. By Sick of Art Chic
    On February 1, 2008 at

    Will someone please please Ban Art Chic from his insane ramblings on here? His 8.45pm.945pm crap is getting old fast,Art your the only one that cares so shut up or please post on another site.Thanks.

  27. By Anonymous
    On February 2, 2008 at

    Crap! Another year, another guy, another abortion. Sheese., Paris is right.. dating guys is a lot of trouble.

  28. By Anonymous
    On February 2, 2008 at

    what is wrong with art chic she should grow up and move to perez if you can’t take the comments stop posting what a ignornant person she is!

  29. By dan
    On February 2, 2008 at

    ban art chick janet i am really tired of her childish ways

  30. By velet
    On February 3, 2008 at

    ME 2 BAN ART CHIC

30 Responses to “OOPS! KATE HUDSON FORGOT TO SUCK IT IN”




XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant Janet Charlton's Hollywood a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate comments will be removed at admin's discretion.

Follow Janet


blog advertising is good for you

Categories

Custom Search
© 2006-2012. All rights reserved. Janet Charlton's Hollywood.
Web Development by Strange, Funny, Weird, Dark | Private Policy

blog advertising is good for you

NEW UPDATE CHECK IT OUT - HOLLYWOOD WHODUNIT!

  • HOLLYWOOD WHODUNIT: LOOK WHO’S NOT TALKING ABOUT HARVEY WEINSTEIN !
    |

    We love every one of Harvey Weinstein’s female accusers – but what about the actresses who AREN’T talking? One actress who won an Oscar in the 90’s has been CONSPICUOUSLY SILENT about the casting couch scandal. It’s because SHE has had a long-term “arrangement” with Harvey in which she traded sex for showbiz favors and it must have been awful, but her career prospered. Now this A-lister is horrified at the prospect of being found out! And, guess what – she’s NOT the only one who’s conspicuously silent!
    Any guesses?

    Save

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  • RSSArchive for NEW UPDATE CHECK IT OUT - HOLLYWOOD WHODUNIT! »

Hottest Movies This Week!

Janet Charlton’s Hollywood Blog Archives

Previously Posted Items

October 2017
M T W T F S S
« Sep    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031