Kim Kardashian can’t do anything right lately. She was publicly doused with flour and labeled a “fur hag!” by an animal activist who protests the fact that Kim flaunts fur. Now she says she’s planning to sue the flour tosser (who had nothing to do with PETA) and PETA has stepped up and volunteered to pay for the flour demonstrator’s legal defense. It’s all the stranger because PETA foolishly paid Khloe Kardashian to strip for one of their “Fur? I’d rather go naked” billboards and the event was prominently featured on “Keeping Up With The Kardashians” in 2008. Despite that, the Kardashians started peddling fur in their DASH boutiques and ignored PETA requests to stop. Obviously, PETA should give more thought to the spokespeople they choose to hire for their billboards.


Posted by Janet on March 25, 2012

There are 27 Comments.  TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK!

27 Comments so far

  1. […] HAS TURNED ON THE KARDASHIANS Janet Charlton's Hollywood Sun, March 25, 2012 9:13 PM UTC Janet Charlton's Hollywood Rate  Loading … Share (function() { var po = document.createElement('script'); […]

  2. By Colin
    On March 25, 2012 at

    Where will it end with the Kardashians? In an era of budget cuts and high unemployment they represent everything that’s vacant and greedy. People look on in disbelief and that’s turning to contempt. It’s no wonder things like this happen.

    And PETA should be more careful who they jump into bed with.

  3. By libby
    On March 25, 2012 at

    everyone was saying tyhis was planned because of the way kim reacted (or didn’t react), she is usally a BIG cybaby whiner.

    this was a set up for attention

  4. By Bannter
    On March 25, 2012 at

    I think PETA is great and Kim can get offended all she wants for being “attacked” with flour although ironically she could care less about the animals who have been attacked and skinned alive so she can look “cute” in fur clothing. The animals should have been so lucky. People who wear fur are selfish and contribute to a brutal industry. No sympathy for her here.

  5. By Frankly My Dear
    On March 25, 2012 at

    A few things:

    1. Animals were put on this earth to be eaten and worn, if you disagree, that’s your right. But it’s my right to eat and wear them if I choose to do so.

    2. Kim’s ass looks so gross in that outfit.

  6. By Walt Cliff
    On March 25, 2012 at

    Kardashians are always gonna put a dollar first. It is the Kardashian way.

    I don’t have a problem with PETA. Although, I am grilling chicken breasts tonight with green peppers, mushrooms, fresh cut pineapple,…etc.

  7. By Muffie
    On March 25, 2012 at

    Anybody who finds this the least little bit funny, should really reevaluate their life, seriously.

    Having somebody, unassumingly attacked from behind, with flour or any other substance or object, is an act of cowardice! I hope KK presses charges on her and her record is scarred for life. That’s assuming it already isn’t, because she is obviously deranged!

  8. By Muffie
    On March 25, 2012 at

    Now back to my initial observation…

    Khloe, that outfit is hideous!! I sure hope you burnt it after this photo op. Your hair looks awful too! Just sayin’

  9. By mish mash
    On March 25, 2012 at

    Total stunt. Who throws flour on the back of someone? If it were real, they would have let her have it in the face. This has Pimp Mama Kris written all over it.

  10. By June
    On March 25, 2012 at

    Where in the hell was the pie in the face?

  11. By Patrick
    On March 25, 2012 at

    Set up.
    Kim would of gone ape shit if it was real.

  12. By Zed
    On March 25, 2012 at

    The Kardashians staged a fake wedding but they would never stage a flour bombing.

  13. By Strom
    On March 26, 2012 at

    KK has been attacked from behind so many times she didnt flinch…but usually it was not with flour but by BLACK men and very consensual.

    Poor Khloe is hogging out more and more.

    Where is T/Tom/tommy on this…was it hie and Fred the Goldmann on the attack?

  14. By forrest gump
    On March 26, 2012 at


  15. By Fabu
    On March 26, 2012 at

    Didn’t this happen to her best friend, that Jonathan Chebain (sp) guy too? I am really torn on this subject. On one hand, I hate that they kill animals just so people can wear fur, on the other hand, I eat meat on a daily basis, so does this make me a hypocrite if I think it’s bad to kill animals so we can wear their fur but I think it’s ok to kill them so we can eat them, esp since we don’t need to (vegetarians have proved that)?

  16. By wms
    On March 26, 2012 at

    This was clearly a staged event. The way it hit her back and she managed to “clean herself up” (if that is possible) so quickly afterward are too much of a coincidence.

    Peta doesnt pay their models for the anti-fur campaign. Im an animal rights person but their marketing and sexism in ads has been going downhill for years. As such they allow trash like this (Naomi Campbell etc) in the campaigns and as these people have no ethics they then turn around and wear dead animal skin later on.

    I wish someone would anally electrocute(although K might enjoy that!), poison, stomp on or skin them alive as that is how most of these animals are killed. They certainly deserve it more than the poor innocent creatures they are making a buck off of. How many millions do these skanks need?

  17. By wms
    On March 26, 2012 at

    @ Frankly my dear

    Women were put on this earth to serve men.

    Blacks were put on this earth to serve whites.


    Cruelty and violence are not right. There is no such thing as Dominion(man made justification to legitimize greed/slavery/etc)or certain people having a “right” to do whatever they want at the expense of others.

  18. By Dawn
    On March 26, 2012 at

    This is a PR stunt. I’m sure the person who threw the flour on that big ole ass got very well paid. KK is simply looking for sympathy because the public are simply getting sick of this whole worthless family.

  19. By Mel Zipskin
    On March 26, 2012 at

    Lame ass stunt, that sex worker is SO tired!!

  20. By Bannter
    On March 26, 2012 at

    @wms you are so right. This is about CRUELTY to living beings who are raised in horrendous conditions their entire lives, in filth and slaughtered in a very painful and brutal way. Not ONE of you would go and have a tooth pulled or filled without novacaine however these poor animals are severely tortured, beaten, burned and skinned alive just to be a frivolous decoration for someone’s collar on a jacket. It is cruelty and it is WRONG. And please eat meat all you want you entitled idiots but don’t be surprised when you end up with coronary heart disease and stroke out and have a heart attack… And when you do I hope there is no pain medication around do you can have a taste of a cruel industry that you support.

  21. By Strom
    On March 26, 2012 at

    Very cruel post

  22. By Frankly My Dear
    On March 26, 2012 at

    Whatever, I’m going to eat all the animals I want and I’m going to wear all the leather, suede and fur I want. If you don’t like it that’s your right/choice, but this is mine and I dare any punk to throw flour or paint on me; I guarantee that’s the last thing that person will ever do. Because when I’m done with them they won’t be concerned about any animals life but their own. I’m sure they wouldn’t throw flour or blood on someone like suge knight cause they would get their ass beat. They only pick on people they can punk.

    I’m glad Khloe called PETA out for being bullies. Next thing you know they will try to beat you if you’re gay or black or fat.

  23. By wms
    On March 26, 2012 at

    The only bully is someone who would brutally kill a defenseless animal for its fur so they can look like they have money or are important. If anything wearing fur shows the person is vain, trashy and tacky. And two hundred years ago you had the right to own as many slaves as you wanted. Justify it anyway you want. Only ignorant vain low-class people wear fur.

  24. By wms
    On March 27, 2012 at

    The only “bully” is someone who would brutally kill an innocent animal for its fur. No one needs to wear fur and only does so to try and flaunt their wealth or look like they are important. All it really shows is how low class, cruel and vain they really are. Try and justify it anyway you want. But, only ignorant low lifes wear fur. Two hundred years ago you could own as many slaves as you want…go figure.

  25. By Frankly My Dear
    On March 27, 2012 at

    Okay wms, just don’t damage my pelts or you will become a pelt.

  26. By gogo
    On March 27, 2012 at

    By the looks of it she couldn’t fit 1 leg into my jeans! Try being poor and hungry…it makes you look more fashionable

  27. By Nadia
    On May 23, 2013 at

    leather bomber jackets and flight jackets made in the USA,Nylon Bomber Jacket fit the bill quite nicely.
    However, it had an ancestor, a forefather so to speak —the Military B10 and B15 Canvas Service Jacket.


XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant Janet Charlton's Hollywood a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate comments will be removed at admin's discretion.

Follow Janet

blog advertising is good for you


Custom Search
© 2006-2012. All rights reserved. Janet Charlton's Hollywood.
Web Development by Strange, Funny, Weird, Dark | Private Policy

blog advertising is good for you


  • Blind Item: America’s Sweetheart Battling A Drug Addiction?


    One of America’s Sweethearts is battling a serious drug addiction- not hers, but her best friend’s. Through the years these two have been stuck to one another like white on rice and her fame rubbed off on her pal. They’ve been roomies, have worked together on set, and even launched a business venture together. But all that success has come with a price. After years of being sober, the less famous friend has fallen HARD off the wagon and our gal doesn’t know what to do. She’s hosted an intervention, hired an addiction specialist, and even threatened to end the friendship, but nothing seems to work. What’s a girl to do?


Janet Charlton’s Hollywood Blog Archives

Previously Posted Items

March 2018
« Feb