SOMETHING FOR SARAH JESSICA PARKER TO THINK ABOUT

Sarah Jessica Parker looks adorable in this publicity photo (at left) for her new Sex and the City movie. Note that her distinctive mole had been all but airbrushed away. (Is it really a mole? If it’s raised and has no pigment, that sounds like a wart to us.) To be kind we will call it a mole, and it has been a point of dissention. Most professionals think Sarah should have the distracting flaw removed and it would improve her looks. Especially on the big screen. But she’s so sweet that nobody wants to be unkind and point it out to her. Maybe she’ll get the hint from these new photos.

14 Comments so far

1. By Anonymous
   On April 4, 2008 at

   Shaving the wart from this beast’s face will just draw undue attention to the rest of it.
   SJP must be well aware of this, and that’s why she has resisted calls to have her signature carbunkle removed.

2. By Anonymous
   On April 4, 2008 at

   Why paint the peacock?

3. By Anonymous
   On April 4, 2008 at

   Yes Janet, she could have the mole removed but here’s the problem. The mole is big enough that having it removed will most likely leave a scar. I am pretty sure that is what Horse Face has been told by not just one but MANY derms/plastic surgeons. And the ones that told her that there would be no scar are the ones she didn’t believe.
   And it’s just like a superficial KUNT like yourself, Janet, to post something this stupid.
   SJP flaw isn’t her mole. It’s her!
   Btw, Janet how much cosmetic surgery have you had?

4. By Anonymous
   On April 4, 2008 at

   Are you a dermatologist now? An uncolored mole is not a wart.

5. By Anonymous
   On April 4, 2008 at

   I am just aghast at your unethical comments. Time for you to retire. How do you live with yourself Janet? Y

6. By Anonymous
   On April 4, 2008 at

   I once saw Sarah interviewed on E! about this…
   She was asked whether she would ever consider having her wart removed; she stamped her right hoof twice in answer, which of course means “no.”

7. By Giddy-up
   On April 4, 2008 at

   To wear heels this high is totally redickerous…does she want to sprain her ankle? Anyhoo, something else besides the mole needs to be removed…like most of the excess flesh on her nose. How did she get to be a (*)?

8. By b
   On April 4, 2008 at

   This woman is far from attractive. She was voted ‘top ten most unattractive women’ by a magazine.

9. By Anonymous
   On April 4, 2008 at

   She does have a nice personality.
   And with a horse-face like that, are you surprised?

10. By Anonymous
    On April 4, 2008 at

    While you’re at it, tell Catherine Keener to get rid of the nasty mole on her chin — and yes, it’s a mole, a warty mole, but a mole nonetheless. Trust me any tiny — and it will be tiny — scar will be better than witchy facial growths.

11. By Anonymous
    On April 5, 2008 at

    I’M SURE SHE’S NEVER NOTICED IT…THANK YOU JANET..!

12. By Anonymous
    On April 5, 2008 at

    Mathen broderick Don’t you just want to bite it off?

13. By Spacelamb
    On April 5, 2008 at

    Odd that she’s had nose jobs and face lifts but never removed that wart. It must be the source of all her power.

14. By Anonymous
    On April 8, 2008 at

    Shoe comment – notice she is lying down – not walking :}

14 Responses to “SOMETHING FOR SARAH JESSICA PARKER TO THINK ABOUT”