Photo Credit: Buzz Foto
Kardashian sisters actually had a pang of conscience and didn’t want to cheat their fans when they backed out of their debit Kard deal. Kim, Khloe, and Kourtney didn’t mind pocketing the excessive fees the cards charged, but what they didn’t like were the negative accusations that went along with it. The Attorney General of Connecticut threatened to investigate their Kard for violating consumer protection laws. That’s why they terminated their profitable debit card agreement.

Posted by Janet on November 29, 2010

There are 24 Comments.  TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK!

24 Comments so far

  1. By SebastianCanada
    On November 29, 2010 at

    Too bad, the card sounded perfect for the ghetto trash that are their fans.

  2. By strom
    On November 30, 2010 at

    This makes how many stories JC has done on the K’s?

    What 2 of the 3 and probably soon 3 of the 3 are are women with large sloppy asses who seem only to be able to attract black men. Amazing that is a role model for any.

  3. By strom
    On November 30, 2010 at

    Looks like Black Wesley Snipes slant eye wife is speaking up. As a porn actress she has much experience in opening her mouth:

  4. By Lenny
    On November 30, 2010 at

    There nothing like coming back from vacation to fresh racist strom in the morning.

  5. By strom
    On November 30, 2010 at

    Truth sometimes is a tough pill….

  6. By Muffin
    On November 30, 2010 at

    Geez, I can’t believe the racist pigs on this comment board!!
    And SebastianCanada, what do you mean by “ghetto trash” and how do you know about “ghetto trash”? Just wonderin’.

  7. By dimes
    On November 30, 2010 at

    I’ve been reading the news stories about this scam card with interest, looking for the one thing that none of them seem to feature – exactly how much money were the sisters making from these cards?

    Were they supposed to get a cut of every fee? Clearly they were aware of the fee structure when they endorsed this scheme, so I agree with Janet that the only reason they’re distancing themselves now is because they don’t want to be seen as complicit in a hustle to rip off teenage girls.

  8. By SebastianCanada
    On November 30, 2010 at

    Muffin, ghetto trash is everywhere these days in the big cities. And, btw, I have run across more white ghetto trash than black ghetto trash in the T.O. area in the last decade. Terms like “Ghetto Trash”, “Trailer Trash”, even “Ginos” and Guidos” are not race or even ethnic-related terms (I have met more than a few people who are not Italian, or even Latin/Mediterranean in origin who fit the Guido mold). They are class-related terms, certainly to people who are under a certain age — like, 70 — and not raging racists.

    So if your mind immediately went to Afro-Americans because of my comment, it is because YOU are provincial or racist, or both.

  9. By Muffin
    On November 30, 2010 at

    Uhm no, SebastianCanada. I am a Treaty Indian and very proud of it!! I am used to people like you hiding behind your obvious racial predjudices, while pretending to not be that way. So yah, I do get offended when people such as your sorry-self talk negatively about any race or ethnicity. Oops, maybe I’m wrong about you, hah?
    Come on SebastianCanada, your intelligence facade is fading, and FAST.

  10. By SebastianCanada
    On November 30, 2010 at

    Muffin, I am multi-ethnic — and would be considered black in America — and proud of it, as other posters here that go back can attest. I am from a very diverse family, and grew up in a super-diverse community near T.O. My background though is not North American, and so is mired in neither PC thinking or the neurotic US VS THEM nastiness created by old North American prejudices…well, not yet anyway. I call it as I see it, and assume that we all understand that whatever one person says is his opinion, sometimes backed up by irrefutable facts.

    As for racial prejudice, if you, as an Indian from Alberta, cannot comprehend the type of racism that someone like myself would get from old-fashioned Canadian WASPs (of which there are still many), then you are the very last person to talk about lack of intelligence. Unlike you, when I am attacked or discriminated against, I do not have a rubber-stamped ethnic title to protect me.

    And btw, anyone who knows about Indian rights and title, could easily guess that you probably look more white than I do.

  11. By SebastianCanada
    On November 30, 2010 at

    So, Muffin, we are in a bit of an “I am rubber, you are glue” situation, no?


  12. By Muffin
    On November 30, 2010 at

    “SebastianCanada” Do I detect a bit of jealousy from you as you stated I have a “rubber-stamped ethnic title”? Or is just your good old bigoted tendencies coming out AGAIN. Well you can call my treaty status what ever you want. I just call it my birth-right. You act like you are some sort of superior expert and the “All-knowing Sebastian”. Ugh.

    Quite frankly, I don’t know you or your ethnic background so if you want to say that it is okay for you to talk “ghetto trash” because some would consider you African American then you go for it. I personally don’t talk trash about my ancestry.

    PS I don’t appreciate you calling me an “Indian from Alberta”. To you I am a Proud First Nations Person!!

  13. By strom
    On November 30, 2010 at

    PC Alert….give us a break on the treaty status….who cares and why should thewre be and what does it have to do with Janet Charlton?

  14. By frank
    On November 30, 2010 at

    Funny… Strom with the “PC” alert, and the MOST racist comments at the same time…

  15. By Lenny
    On November 30, 2010 at

    You got to love a man with this much racial hangup that he let’s everyone know that Wesley Snipes is black. strom, even your hero Hitler can see that.

  16. By Mel Zipskin
    On November 30, 2010 at

    Strom is so damn gay I bet he cruises for that BBC in bathrooms everywhere. Strom … you know what BBC means, don’t you!

    Sebastian, thanks for outing yourself as a person of color, I respect that, and you.

  17. By Bu
    On November 30, 2010 at

    That deal has Kris all over it!

  18. By Sal Mineo's Zipper Squirrel
    On November 30, 2010 at

    strom says “only” be able to attrack black men, thus inferring his belief that black men are inferior to whatever HE is; then he goes on to say “black” Wesley Snipes as tho the man’s color were part of his name or his title even; then in the very next breath he mentions Snipe’s wife’s “slant eyes” as tho, yes, that too where a part of her very identification.
    That this incredibly disgusting excuse for a human being is allowed to continue vomiting up his bilious poison and hateful racism is beyond me. Why Janet hasn’t installed an Anti-strom button by now one can only wonder, but surely losing all her regular visitors and winding up with only him will hurt. Something to think about.

  19. By Sal Mineo's Zipper Squirrel
    On November 30, 2010 at

    I’m curious, wondering that these girls, or at the very least, their momager didn’t have a first-rate lawyer go completely over the particulars of all of it first, what they would get, what the costs would be to the consumer. That in this day and age, people who have money to be sued out of in a class action suit didn’t throughly over every last detail before signing on the dotted line is just not to be believed.
    The common dunce in the corner wearing the pointy hat would know better than to put their name on this scam. Burning the public, in the end is just not healthy to the pocketbook.

  20. By strom
    On December 1, 2010 at

    Give us a break on the Treaty Indian monologe. Why are you so ashamed to simply say you are a Canadian?

    Indians in America have let pity and a guaranteed handout screw up their future. Many of their leaders have followed the Jackson/Sharpton plan for making themselves rich while keeping their people poor and embittered.

    America lost much when its black citizens decided they really wanted to be Africans instead of Americans. Go to black Africa for 15 minutes and you will come back a bit more humble.

  21. By strom
    On December 2, 2010 at

  22. By wim
    On December 2, 2010 at

    I just hope this is a bad picture…………..

  23. By Strom
    On December 9, 2010 at

  24. By icon design
    On September 16, 2012 at

    I advise to you to look a site on which there is a lot of information on this question.

    P.S. Please review icons


XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant Janet Charlton's Hollywood a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate comments will be removed at admin's discretion.

Follow Janet

blog advertising is good for you


Custom Search
© 2006-2012. All rights reserved. Janet Charlton's Hollywood.
Web Development by Strange, Funny, Weird, Dark | Private Policy

blog advertising is good for you


    This bad boy seems to have calmed down since he got serious about his former pornstar girlfriend and he has his friends wondering WHY. What’s so special about HER? We hear she keeps him satisfied by supplying her MALE porn costars for his entertainment. The bad boy pays each guy $5000 per visit so they are highly motivated to make him happy. It’s a family affair – the girlfriend watches while the bad boy fiddles around with the guys!


  • RSSArchive

Hottest Movies This Week!

Janet Charlton’s Hollywood Blog Archives

Previously Posted Items

October 2016
« Sep