THIS BARE BOTTOM FASHION ILLUSION FROM JAPAN COULD CAUSE A TRAFFIC PILE-UP!

Japan has SOME sense of humor. Supposedly, these are not girls with their underwear showing- they are prints on the skirts that make it LOOK like panties are visible! Is it possible this is all an optical illusion? It’s claimed that no skin or underpants are really showing, but it is very startling. Trick photography notwithstanding, this could definitely become a hazard to ogling drivers. We wonder who would be the first to sport this look in Hollywood? Child bride Courtney Stodden perhaps?

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Posted by Janet on April 2, 2012

There are 36 Comments.  TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK!

36 Comments so far

  1. […] COULD CAUSE A TRAFFIC PILE-UP! Janet Charlton's Hollywood Mon, April 2, 2012 9:04 PM UTC Janet Charlton's Hollywood Rate  Loading … Share (function() { var po = document.createElement('script'); […]

  2. By Mary-Claire
    On April 2, 2012 at

    Civiization has hit an all time BOTTOM.

  3. By Strom
    On April 2, 2012 at

  4. By Walter Cliff
    On April 2, 2012 at

    Where on earth did you drag up those old pictures? They have been around for years!

    There’s even a comment from http://www.snopes.com about them.

    Here’s the link:

    http://www.snopes.com/photos/risque/skirts.asp

  5. By angie MN
    On April 2, 2012 at

    This is like 7 years old!!!! & it is not real! The legs match up. You really should look things up to see if they are real before you post them!!

  6. By Denise
    On April 2, 2012 at

    Strom, what’s your point in posting that link?

  7. By Walter Cliff
    On April 2, 2012 at

    There’s even a comment from http://www.snopes.com about them.

  8. By Muffie
    On April 2, 2012 at

    Hahahaaaa

    That’s too funny!!

    Hahahaaaaaaaaa

  9. By Walter Cliff
    On April 2, 2012 at

    Where on earth did you drag up those old pictures? They have been around for years!

    There’s even a comment from http://www.snopes.com about them.

    Here’s the link:

    http://www.snopes.com/photos/risque/skirts.asp

  10. By libby
    On April 2, 2012 at

    yeah, the photos are digitally enhanced and you only see these pics in porn magazines over there.

    do your homework, janet!

  11. By The Hammer
    On April 2, 2012 at

    You know what Strom’s point in anything, it’s the Black man. It must have been painful when walked in on your girl on her knees and you saw all that dick in her mouth. It’s okay, time heals everything, oops, I’ll take that back.

  12. By forrest gump
    On April 2, 2012 at

    no doubt: ASIAN GIRLS AT THEIR VERY BEST!!

  13. By Reta
    On April 2, 2012 at

    Angie is 100% right and this is really old and they DO match up. And anybody who clicks on any link strom would supply deserves the virus they get from him! Bottoms UP!

  14. By What a horror show
    On April 2, 2012 at

    This is so gross. Can you imagine teen girls copying this? EWWW. They will have every PEDO in the world after them. Please make it go away!!!

  15. By yoyo
    On April 3, 2012 at

    Janet, seriously? Courtney Stodden? She’d wear the real thing with a lucite heel up her ying yang. This isn’t humorous fashion just simply tasteless.

  16. By Strom
    On April 3, 2012 at

    Looney rant aside, the You Tube links are direct from You Tube so would not be infectious. The point is that the first thing the spade did was shun his own race and head for a white looking girl! Doesn’t say much for black women or the white women who are pressured.

    The jap’s have a true identity problem and any simple little trend spreads like wildfire and then is gone in 30 days. Makes a few people much $$$.

  17. By Jeff
    On April 3, 2012 at

    Walter Cliff:
    If you’re going to link to Snopes, then link directly to the correct page, which is http://www.snopes.com/photos/risque/skirts.asp

  18. By Leo
    On April 3, 2012 at

    Something that Rhianna would proudly wear!!

  19. By Walt Cliff
    On April 3, 2012 at

    Jeff, Of course, I originally did. In fact, I had both on my two previous posts on this topic. Both were deleted. Both had a message that they were being evaluated. I just typed it in like that to see it was the snopes site that they or whoever found offensive.

    I’ve linked to many specific pages on websites and never had problem. Oh well, not a biggie.

  20. By Edie
    On April 3, 2012 at

    Walt’s been around here for years and knows how to post a link correctly. You must be new. If that offends you stick around and wait till they post something about the kardashians and then you will have plenty to nitpic.

  21. By superfan
    On April 3, 2012 at

    kim kardashian…she’s got quite a booty,..why don’t she “show” it off,(wearing one of these skirts) LOL!!!

  22. By Janet
    On April 4, 2012 at

    Walt, My site is set to automatically hold comments that use offensive words – it doesn’t catch them all, but sometimes. So choose your words carefully!

  23. By Walt Cliff
    On April 4, 2012 at

    Janet, There was NOTHING offensive about my post. Not a single dirty word.

    I was originally the second or third person to post and I asked the questions, “what was going on this is old news and I gave the page link of snopes and the website snopes and that was all.

    I don’t consider myself a troublemaker on this site.

    I am truly shocked that your “automatically holds comments that use offensive words.” There are those on here that use graphic sexual language and graphic offensive language and I have never seen them censored and they should be. I am all for freedom of speech but you have some kind of standards otherwise you will run off any new readers due to the nasty racists things said here.

  24. By Walt Cliff
    On April 4, 2012 at

    amended:

    I am all for freedom of speech but you have to have some standards expected by your readers/posters. Otherwise, you will run off any new posters due to the nasty racists & offensive things that are said here.

    Of course, that’s my personal opinion.

  25. By Walt Cliff
    On April 4, 2012 at

    Oh well, I see they are now posted.

    Now would be a good time for a beer. Anyone want to join me?

  26. By Strom
    On April 4, 2012 at

    Unfortunately you never know who that is posting as Janet or anyone else….people post under my name all the time so it might be someone trying to look important!

  27. By Strom
    On April 4, 2012 at

    Anyone who says Kim K has a shapely bottom instead of just a large one which has been pummeled w/ BLACK meat should be suspect! MAybe it’s T/Tom/Tommy!

  28. By Patrick
    On April 4, 2012 at

    I’ll slam a beer with you Walt.
    And if offensive words get you into trouble…REta says dirty, bad, um i’m tellin, words all the time.
    Dirty, dirty mouthed, REta.

  29. By Walt Cliff
    On April 4, 2012 at

    Ahhhhh, the temptation for me to blurt out (in bold typing mind you!!) the “Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television.” LOL !!!!

    Maybe even bold type them more than once (insert evil laugh) !!! 🙂

    Maybe wish something naughty on their poor mommy. (yeah, that’ll do it!) 🙂

    or maybe just lift my finger in the air (you get one guess) and then request another cocktail to go with my olive. 🙂

  30. By Walt Cliff
    On April 4, 2012 at

    Patrick, I just ordered up one for you in a dirty glass for ya. lol

  31. By Patrick
    On April 4, 2012 at

    That’ll be fine.

  32. By cell phone numbers go public
    On April 8, 2012 at

    Why visitors still make use of to read news papers
    when in this technological world the whole thing
    is existing on net?

  33. By Strom
    On April 8, 2012 at

    Anyone who says Kim K has a shapely bottom instead of just an overly large one which has been pummeled w/ BLACK meat should be suspect!

    Maybe it’s T/Tom/Tommy!

  34. By icon pack
    On September 17, 2012 at

    What good topic

    P.S. Please review icons

  35. I seriously love your blog.. Excellent colors & theme.
    Did you develop this web site yourself? Please reply back as I’m looking to create my own blog and would like to find out where you got
    this from or exactly what the theme is called.
    Cheers!

    Also visit my homepage :: 高品質 ステンカラーコート 通販

  36. By Strom
    On January 2, 2014 at

    Go away

36 Responses to “THIS BARE BOTTOM FASHION ILLUSION FROM JAPAN COULD CAUSE A TRAFFIC PILE-UP!”




XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant Janet Charlton's Hollywood a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate comments will be removed at admin's discretion.

Follow Janet


blog advertising is good for you

Categories

Custom Search
© 2006-2012. All rights reserved. Janet Charlton's Hollywood.
Web Development by Strange, Funny, Weird, Dark | Private Policy

blog advertising is good for you
  • HOLD ONTO YOUR PANTIES, WE HAVE A DOUBLE DOSE OF GAYNESS TODAY! TWO HOLLYWOOD WHODUNITS!
    |

    BLIND_ITEM_NEW_#CUT

    This bad boy seems to have calmed down since he got serious about his former pornstar girlfriend and he has his friends wondering WHY. What’s so special about HER? We hear she keeps him satisfied by supplying her MALE porn costars for his entertainment. The bad boy pays each guy $5000 per visit so they are highly motivated to make him happy. It’s a family affair – the girlfriend watches while the bad boy fiddles around with the guys!

    READ MORE!

    Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
  • RSSArchive

Hottest Movies This Week!

Janet Charlton’s Hollywood Blog Archives

Previously Posted Items

July 2017
M T W T F S S
« Jun    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31