THIS BARE BOTTOM FASHION ILLUSION FROM JAPAN COULD CAUSE A TRAFFIC PILE-UP!

Japan has SOME sense of humor. Supposedly, these are not girls with their underwear showing- they are prints on the skirts that make it LOOK like panties are visible! Is it possible this is all an optical illusion? It’s claimed that no skin or underpants are really showing, but it is very startling. Trick photography notwithstanding, this could definitely become a hazard to ogling drivers. We wonder who would be the first to sport this look in Hollywood? Child bride Courtney Stodden perhaps?

35 Comments

35 thoughts on “THIS BARE BOTTOM FASHION ILLUSION FROM JAPAN COULD CAUSE A TRAFFIC PILE-UP!

  1. This is like 7 years old!!!! & it is not real! The legs match up. You really should look things up to see if they are real before you post them!!

  2. yeah, the photos are digitally enhanced and you only see these pics in porn magazines over there.

    do your homework, janet!

  3. You know what Strom’s point in anything, it’s the Black man. It must have been painful when walked in on your girl on her knees and you saw all that dick in her mouth. It’s okay, time heals everything, oops, I’ll take that back.

  4. Angie is 100% right and this is really old and they DO match up. And anybody who clicks on any link strom would supply deserves the virus they get from him! Bottoms UP!

  5. This is so gross. Can you imagine teen girls copying this? EWWW. They will have every PEDO in the world after them. Please make it go away!!!

  6. Janet, seriously? Courtney Stodden? She’d wear the real thing with a lucite heel up her ying yang. This isn’t humorous fashion just simply tasteless.

  7. Looney rant aside, the You Tube links are direct from You Tube so would not be infectious. The point is that the first thing the spade did was shun his own race and head for a white looking girl! Doesn’t say much for black women or the white women who are pressured.

    The jap’s have a true identity problem and any simple little trend spreads like wildfire and then is gone in 30 days. Makes a few people much $$$.

  8. Jeff, Of course, I originally did. In fact, I had both on my two previous posts on this topic. Both were deleted. Both had a message that they were being evaluated. I just typed it in like that to see it was the snopes site that they or whoever found offensive.

    I’ve linked to many specific pages on websites and never had problem. Oh well, not a biggie.

  9. Walt’s been around here for years and knows how to post a link correctly. You must be new. If that offends you stick around and wait till they post something about the kardashians and then you will have plenty to nitpic.

  10. kim kardashian…she’s got quite a booty,..why don’t she “show” it off,(wearing one of these skirts) LOL!!!

  11. Walt, My site is set to automatically hold comments that use offensive words – it doesn’t catch them all, but sometimes. So choose your words carefully!

  12. Janet, There was NOTHING offensive about my post. Not a single dirty word.

    I was originally the second or third person to post and I asked the questions, “what was going on this is old news and I gave the page link of snopes and the website snopes and that was all.

    I don’t consider myself a troublemaker on this site.

    I am truly shocked that your “automatically holds comments that use offensive words.” There are those on here that use graphic sexual language and graphic offensive language and I have never seen them censored and they should be. I am all for freedom of speech but you have some kind of standards otherwise you will run off any new readers due to the nasty racists things said here.

  13. amended:

    I am all for freedom of speech but you have to have some standards expected by your readers/posters. Otherwise, you will run off any new posters due to the nasty racists & offensive things that are said here.

    Of course, that’s my personal opinion.

  14. Oh well, I see they are now posted.

    Now would be a good time for a beer. Anyone want to join me?

  15. Unfortunately you never know who that is posting as Janet or anyone else….people post under my name all the time so it might be someone trying to look important!

  16. Anyone who says Kim K has a shapely bottom instead of just a large one which has been pummeled w/ BLACK meat should be suspect! MAybe it’s T/Tom/Tommy!

  17. I’ll slam a beer with you Walt.
    And if offensive words get you into trouble…REta says dirty, bad, um i’m tellin, words all the time.
    Dirty, dirty mouthed, REta.

  18. Ahhhhh, the temptation for me to blurt out (in bold typing mind you!!) the “Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television.” LOL !!!!

    Maybe even bold type them more than once (insert evil laugh) !!! 🙂

    Maybe wish something naughty on their poor mommy. (yeah, that’ll do it!) 🙂

    or maybe just lift my finger in the air (you get one guess) and then request another cocktail to go with my olive. 🙂

  19. Patrick, I just ordered up one for you in a dirty glass for ya. lol

  20. Why visitors still make use of to read news papers
    when in this technological world the whole thing
    is existing on net?

  21. Anyone who says Kim K has a shapely bottom instead of just an overly large one which has been pummeled w/ BLACK meat should be suspect!

    Maybe it’s T/Tom/Tommy!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *