Is Nicole Kidman losing her children? Except at her wedding, we haven’t seen photos of Hollywood’s highest paid actress, Nicole, with her kids, Connor and Isabella, for a very long time. Supposedly she had custody for six months of the year but we wonder if Tom has convinced her not to interrupt their home schooling by taking them away to Australia or wherever. There’s always the chance that the Scientology based home schooling (brainwashing?) the kids are getting could – in a subtle way – be turning them against their mother. We ‘wonder how Nicole feels about this education her kids are getting – Scientologists teach what they like and don’t believe in going to college. After a number of years of Scientology studies, the kids will have more in common with Tom and have a hard time relating to their mother. Judging from the photo above, Connor is already in deep.


Posted by Janet on November 30, 2006

There are no Comments.  TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK!

No Comment

  1. By Anonymous
    On November 30, 2006 at

    It’s a cult, plain and simple. They don’t believe in college because anyone educated would see how rediculous this “religeon” is. Just sad how celebrities are so needy for something to ground them they cling onto this garbage. Tom is a fanatic, he get’s so much attention from this and that’s why he is so addicted..he’s a sick man.

  2. By Ishouldntbedoingthis
    On November 30, 2006 at

    Scientology is just sad.

  3. By Anonymous
    On November 30, 2006 at

    no judgements, 3: 11 just a few comments.
    this photo is of the groom’s party?
    the dude of the left, that is uh.. cruise’s best man?
    this is also the man who accompanied cruise and holmes on their honeymoon?

  4. By Anonymous
    On November 30, 2006 at

    She never wanted to be a mother. She used to go off on movie shoots for 6 weeks at a time and never call. Tom is insane. These kids were adopted from the Clearwater Scientology Center. They never had a chance.

  5. By Anonymous
    On November 30, 2006 at

    Scientology is a religion for tax purposes only; it has nothing to do with God. It’s a dangerous, destructive discipline. You can tell because Cruise is self-destructing before everyone’s eyes. The sooner, the better.

  6. By Anonymous
    On November 30, 2006 at

    Wrong about the photos. Kidman was spotted with her daughter shopping in August 06 in CA. Isabella is smiling, and Nicole clearly wants the photogs to go away.
    Kidman’s kids are frequently on the set of her movies. I don’t think we have photos of them with her on the Moulin Rouge set, but it’s been talked about before.
    Did we have photos of Cruise with their kids when Nicole clearly had custody of them the year they were spotted at a Lakers game and a Yankees game? It was after the divorce but before Stepford Wives came out.
    They share custody and both are seen with their kids, and both spend time with their kids when the cameras aren’t on them. Quite frankly, I don’t remember seeing too many photos of either Tom or Nicole with their kids too often when they were married. It wasn’t until Tom needed a PR boost that he and Katie did their slow walk for the cameras at the kids’ soccer games (starting after word of Katie’s pregnancy appeared). Prior to Katie’s pregnancy, did we see a lot of Isabella & Connor with either Nicole or Tom when they were married and after their divorce? No. It’s entirely possible that both spend plenty of time with their kids when the cameras aren’t around.

  7. By mrsmogul
    On November 30, 2006 at

    I was just thinking this!!! Nicole seems to have left her children. It’s probably not true but she IS NEVER photographed with them. I think it’s strange!

  8. By Anonymous
    On November 30, 2006 at

    Apparently Nicole is fiercely protective of her privacy when she is with her kids. Its true she’s never been photographed with them very often but that doesn’t mean they don’t spend time together. And also true; Tom wasn’t photographed with them until he slammed Brooke and needed some positive press.

  9. By Anonymous
    On November 30, 2006 at

    The guy on Tom’s left is David M. and he is the leader of Scientology (was L.Ron Hubbard’s disciple then took over after his death)he is also Tom’s best friend. Apparently he went on TomKat’s honeymoon with them. How weird is that? I wonder if Tom’s kids went too?

  10. By Anonymous
    On November 30, 2006 at

    $cientology is a scam, plain and simple.

  11. By Hedda Bopper
    On November 30, 2006 at

    Tom Cruise is a sad little man,5ft6 with a short mans complex and an ego bigger than his gut.Why have”nt child welfare agents been called re,the sad and sick brainwashing by tomfat?If I have to see onr more fluff story on tofats sham of a wedding to ol big foot I will simply have to drive by the scientology scam center and yell.
    OYE VEY….

  12. By Anonymous
    On November 30, 2006 at

    I read that Conor and Isabella would go with them to the Maldives for a few days, then would go home. Maybe Tom’s best man was going to accompany them home.

  13. By Anonymous
    On November 30, 2006 at

    Come on..his “best friend” is his lover. Pretty obvious.

  14. By jess
    On November 30, 2006 at

    I am SO sick of these gossip sites and magazines talking about Nicole Kidman the victim. If she isn’t seeing her kids it’s her own fault, whether Tom wants her to see them or not. If Tom is trying to keep them from her why doesn’t she take him to court to enforce the visitation rules? She is not a victim, she chooses to spend most of her time away from her kids, does she even have a home in Los Angeles where her kids live?

  15. By Anonymous
    On December 1, 2006 at

    Cruise is a freak – pure and simple. That Scientology isn’t a religion – if you read up on it – it is a cult. Those poor kids better get away and live with Mom. God, do I feel sorry for them. He is so creepy that I shudder.

  16. By Anonymous
    On December 1, 2006 at

    To paraphrase Buzz Lightyear from the movie Toy Story: Tom Cruise is a sad, strange little man. And you never did see much of Nicole Kidman with those children, anyway. It’s not a big surprise that she’s not being photographed with with them now.

  17. By Anonymous
    On December 1, 2006 at

    That Scientology isn’t a religion – if you read up on it – it is a cult.
    What is YOUR religion?

  18. By Anonymous
    On December 1, 2006 at

    Well, 6:19 – I can tell by what you wrote you don’t know a damned thing about Scientology. I don’t knock anyone’s religion – but this is just a looney, hocus-pocus outfit designed to bilk people out of their money. Seriously, read up on it. It is no more a religion than Dialing for Dollars is.

  19. By Anonymous
    On December 1, 2006 at

    Don’t forget that L. Ron Hubbard was a Satanist. He was thrown out of his coven for having sex with another coven member’s wife.

  20. By Anonymous
    On December 1, 2006 at

    Nicole has always been a career woman with 2 kids. Her mother reminder her of this when Tom dumped her and refused to let N. wallow in bed. Now that Nicole’s new hub has proved himself less than reliable, she’s working again same as she did after the divorce. Seems she works to cope. Her kids are the least of her worries as she’s probably got a load of nannies and tutors for the little brats. These people are uber rich. They don’t need to raise their kids themselves, they pay someone else to do the dirty work. Duh!

  21. By Jen
    On December 1, 2006 at

    I loved Tom Cruise in “Legend”.
    His “religion” scares me though.
    I’m 100% for freedom of religion and 100% againist cults that suck away money and sanity from the members.

  22. By Anonymous
    On December 1, 2006 at

    Scientolgy is evil! Evil, I say!!

  23. By Anonymous
    On December 1, 2006 at

    you are talking about a pix of a father, his best man and his son…not of a scientology gay controlling freak bastard…lets move on already….

  24. By Anonymous
    On December 2, 2006 at

    I don’t think Nicole would abandon her kids. She’s just not a publicity whore, so she doesn’t show them off on purpose the way he does. Plus her new husband is in rehab or whatever. SHe has her hands full lately. I feel sorry for those kids. Tom Cruise is a complete nut. I can’t understand why any woman would agree to be his beard.

  25. By Nicola
    On December 2, 2006 at

    Tom Cruise is typical of most short men.Big ego to compensate for lack of height. Scientology is a cult not a religion. It was concocted by some sci-fi nut with a bigger ego than Tom. Was he also five foot nothing? As far as I am concerned Tom and Katie are not really married. Certainly not in the eyes of God. I think what really infuriates me is the fact that we all pander to these celebs. If we just ignored them maybe they would “go away”. I mean really, do you go to see a film because it has a great script and great acting or because a certain ‘celeb’ is in it? Just to finish, I still say Suri is not his. She looks a good 10-12 months old now.

  26. By Pat
    On December 2, 2006 at

    Remember the good old days when everyone wasn’t insane?

  27. By Anonymous
    On December 2, 2006 at

    The whole idea of any so called “religion” that is not based on The Word of GOD is obsured.. The fact is that there is only ONE GOD that is the creator of the entire universe and all that every has or every will exsist…People do not like to make themselves responsible to ONE GOD…they have set themselves up as the trinity of being: the ME, MYSELF, and I thought process…Until anyone is ready to conform to the Word of GOD and leave behind the beliefs that are only in the mind and heart of humans, can real salvation begin…God was manifest in the flesh of Christ, and that flesh died upon the cross, rose again…no triune GOD, but only ONE being….I would urge any who read this to find themselves a King James Bible and begin what will be the life changing experienced of coming to know who the one and true GOD is…
    If, you wish to contact me, you may,
    May you search and be found by the only ONE that can save you and make you whole.
    Jesus is GOD…..there is no other………none…

  28. By Pat
    On December 2, 2006 at

    That’s great. King James bible, okay. Old testament right? Then I can kill my neighbour for burning a cow and fouling the air on my street right? Or would that be too literal a translation? Now that’s obsured/absurd.
    Remember the good old days when everyone wasn’t gay too?
    Or a religious nut!

  29. By Anonymous
    On December 2, 2006 at

    Before you start running down a religion, maybe you should take a look at the basis of the Christian religion and it’s Holy Bible. There are some really very hard to believe stories in that book that people are afraid to question, and yet are just as much a piece of fiction as anything I have read. And BTW Doris Day was/is a Scientologist, and her son went to college. Don’t assume….you know the rest. As for Ms Charlton’s gossip….please her head is so far up her butt she wouldn’t know the truth if it hit her in the face.

  30. By Nelson
    On December 3, 2006 at

    I happened to be in the Airport lounge and subsequent 17 hour flight from Sydney to LA with Connor, Isabella and Tom’s sister who was escorting the kids (this was on the way back to the USA after Nicole’s wedding in June). Naomi Watts was on the same flight and spent the time hanging out with them, as well. I was repeatedly struck by how “normal” the kids seemed. Friendly, unpretentious, playful, patient, well behaved. Regardless of what anyone thinks about Scientology or the fact that they’re home schooled, it’s refreshing that they are such healthy, happy, well adjusted kids in spite of the celebrtiy-skewed worled in which they live. I don’t think we’re ever going to be reading reports of their drunken disorderly behaviour or seeing paparazzi pics of them being carried our of nightclubs without their underwear.

  31. By Anonymous
    On December 3, 2006 at

    Nicole just wants those kids around her at her own convenience..when she’s in a ‘mothering mood’’s ok for her

  32. By Chers Wig
    On December 3, 2006 at

    Tom cruise and all the other hack cult members need to be boycotted,any movie,cd,tv show,diet program by one of these side show freak jobs should be completly boycotted`they are scary.

  33. By Anonymous
    On December 4, 2006 at

    Remember folks..You got all this info from a gossip rag. I was gossiped about in the press myself and those journalists will pretend they are your “friends” and meanwhile print complete les about you and twist your words and take them out of context. The sad part is alot of folks seem to believe it.

  34. By Pat
    On December 4, 2006 at

    Religions kill in the name of their{forgiving god}. It’s what god wants! A good fight right? WE are all pretty messed up right now because of religions don’t ya think?
    Just use the force anonymous coward…nobody gets bombed in their bed.

  35. By Pat
    On December 5, 2006 at

    Sure, sure.
    Thanks for straightening me out. I’m glad this shithole disaster war is just my problem thanks to my religion. My goodness!

  36. By Pat
    On December 5, 2006 at

    Remember when everyone wasn’t gay, insane or a jesus freak?
    Can’t you be spiritual without having to define it within the parameters of some self righteous indignant baby bombing religion. Your stupid. I’m outta here.

  37. By Brenda Boycott
    On December 5, 2006 at


  38. By Pat
    On December 7, 2006 at

    Actually. I’m a guy.
    And hardly a fucking coward… anonymous.
    Your a scientology retard aren’t you?
    I’d have you pissing your pants in person buddy. lol

  39. By Anonymous
    On December 7, 2006 at

    tom cruise,michael jackson, tom cruise.michael jackson. I’d have to choose sweet death….

  40. By Reyna
    On December 10, 2006 at

    I agree, Tom, Michael Jackson, and Katie Holmes can fall off the face of the earth and the world will still move on, more happier than ever.

  41. By CAREN
    On December 11, 2006 at

    Who’s the guy in the picture with To m and his son? Nicole’s replacement?

  42. By Anonymous
    On December 11, 2006 at

    Oh my god, they are so gay–that poor boy (his son)

  43. By Ms. It
    On December 17, 2006 at

    Tom Cruise is a total image freak. Inside he’s a black hole. In all of his egomaniacal movies he plays himself. So what? He’s the “perfect” American ideal, and he’s creating the “perfect” American wife. May they ass-end to the nether world with the other Cretins (Thetins) from whence they supposedly came. Have you looked in his eyes when he smiles? Teeth galore, no heart, no soul. Shudder… Anyone who can’t think for themselves deserves to be brainwashed.

No Responses to “TOM CRUISE: KING OF WHAT?”

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

By submitting a comment here you grant Want more details? Visit my bio and click on link! a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate comments will be removed at admin's discretion.

Follow Janet

blog advertising is good for you


Custom Search
© 2006-2012. All rights reserved. Janet Charlton's Hollywood.
Web Development by Strange, Funny, Weird, Dark | Private Policy

blog advertising is good for you



    Love him or hate him, this guy is a loudmouth who doesn’t hesitate to tell it like he sees it- but there’s one thing he NEVER talks about: his prostate problem. Long story short: he LEAKS! He likes to project an image of macho virility, but under his custom made suits are custom made “diapers.” He’s VERY self-conscious and has absorbent but undetectable “panty liners” sewn into all his underwear, to avoid wet spots. Thanks to his arrogant behavior, he has more than a few enemies and he’s terrified his secret will be exposed and he’ll be forever ridiculed!


Janet Charlton’s Hollywood Blog Archives

Previously Posted Items

May 2019
« Apr