WHY JENNIFER ANISTON GETS ACTING JOBS

Jennifer Aniston has a lot of online critics who cannot understand why her face sells magazines or her haircuts are newsworthy. Fact is, it so happens plenty of people are still interested in the “Friends” star all over the world. Jennifer’s movies take the most criticism from nasty online commenters who can’t fathom why she is paid so much to do below average movies. In other words, why does she have a career? Personally we think she’s a nice girl and we like what she does with her money. But here’s something for the haters to digest: Jen’s modest movie “We’re the Millers” was made for 37 million dollars and has grossed $266 million worldwide. So there.

16 Comments

16 thoughts on “WHY JENNIFER ANISTON GETS ACTING JOBS

  1. I usually like her movies…there have been a couple that I didn’t see, I wasn’t interested but I’m sure they made money.

  2. Surprisingly, I liked the movie but Horrible Bosses is one of my all time favorite comedies.

  3. Jennifer Aniston and Jason Sudeikis are magic on screen together. I would love to see them work together again outside of “Horrible Bosses”…she was also great opposite Owen Wilson too. Her problem is that her BFF Andrea is the one that runs lines with her and that doesn’t work for her in her performances.

  4. Mediocrity sells because it doesn’t threaten anyone. She’s the epitome of “ordinary.”

  5. I guess I just don’t get it. I really only like British movies, their actors are so much better and the plots are better also. Aniston is just blah to me and not at all attractive.

  6. She must have born under a lucky star, that is, not to be always typecast as Rachel Greene from “Friends”. Most of the other stars on “Friends” have not had any great parts. To me, her movies are always the same and have the same plot. I would love to have her money, although not jealous of her. And I would not want her screwed up love life. A rag mag has pics of Justin Theroux making out with a blonde, while she was off making another bimbo movie.

  7. Good point Janet. She is nice in general and especially to people working on her movies, and more importantly, they provide a lot of jobs. That said, I have seen very few of her movies, one or two at the most.

  8. Janet,

    Sharkanado made good money, too. Not sure making money is a valid criteria regarding someone’s talent.

  9. Below average movies? I wish people would do their homework. Most of her movies make a profit because they don’t cost a bazillion dollars to produce and because she has an audience who enjoys her comedic talent. In a business full of drama, arrogance, entitlement, alcoholics, drug addicts, promiscuity and creeps, people like that she appears refreshingly nice and down-to-earth. Relatable. Good to hear Millers did so well although I’m not surprised. The DVD sales will push up the numbers even more.

  10. Because vanilla is easy to stomach would be my answer to why Aniston keeps working.

  11. The fact that JA movies do well is proof positive that the world is completely saturated with unimaginative ding bats

  12. THIS YOU HAVE TO EXPLAIN TO ME……..WHAT DOES SHE GET 15-20 MILLION A MOVIE,……..AND THEY ALL SUCK!!!!!! AM I ALONE HERE?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *