WOULD YOU PAY TO SEE TWO SEQUELS OF FIFTY SHADES OF GREY?

Since “Fifty Shades of Grey” just passed the 500 million dollar mark internationally, the pressure is ON for a follow up. A rumor circulated that Jamie Dornan was NOT interested in doing a sequel, but that turned out NOT to be true. Money TALKS! Jamie only earned around $100,000 for the first “Shades”(and we assume Dakota Johnson earned a bit more) It’s rumored that he can expect to be paid around fifteen million for two sequels. Does the world really WANT two sequels? We were disappointed in the movie and wonder if many ticket buyers would do it again.

Photo Credit: AKM-GSI

20 Comments so far

1. By Noblecascade
   On March 5, 2015 at

   yes, loved the movie, looking forward to the sequels.

2. By Philberto Cardenez
   On March 5, 2015 at

   utter and complete rubbish

3. By Palermo
   On March 5, 2015 at

   Never read the books and certainly wouldn’t pay to see the movies.

4. By Denise
   On March 5, 2015 at

   I am definitely looking forward to a sequel. Can’t wait.

5. By mister baja
   On March 5, 2015 at

   I woldn’t pay to see an actor anyway.
   well, jim carrey is my exception.

6. By freddiem
   On March 5, 2015 at

   Is a sequal like a sequel?

7. By gen
   On March 6, 2015 at

   I would not pay to see a sequal or a sequel. C’mon, fix it!! Sheesh.

8. By gen
   On March 6, 2015 at

   I would not see a sequal or a sequel. C’mon! Fix it!!

9. By Colin
   On March 6, 2015 at

   The movie committed the worst crime. It was BORING! And they were both as thick as planks.

10. By Cindy
    On March 6, 2015 at

    Absolutely would see them. Enjoyed the movie and thought both were good in their roles. Looking forward to the DVD release in May or June, too.

11. By Daggers
    On March 6, 2015 at

    Is Dakota trying to look like Medusa? Horrible hair style.

12. By Diva
    On March 6, 2015 at

    Not interested

13. By Bluejay
    On March 6, 2015 at

    The movie was supposed to make a mega star out of Johnson. She most likely will fade into obscurity with her millions.

14. By Janet
    On March 6, 2015 at

    Done. Thanks!

15. By No Way
    On March 7, 2015 at

    These 2 actors have zero chemistry. Even on the red carpet or in photos they look like they don’t even like each other. Very awkward. No, I won’t pay to see any sequels nor would I pay to see the first movie either. I read the 3 books (got them for free so didn’t pay there either). The writing was so horribly bad it was more a comedy than anything sexy.

16. By Bluejay
    On March 7, 2015 at

    Dakota Johnson is kind of pretty, and kind of not so pretty. Strange combination in one person.

17. By Nadia
    On March 8, 2015 at

    Nope. Not seeing this or any of them. Tried to read the damn book and it was excruciating. Like nails on a chalkboard. So badly written it seemed like something a teenage girl had written. If the writer gets her way to write the screenplay I i,agine the viewers of the sequel will drop dramatically. Yes, she had an idea but that’s about all I can say about that. Enjoy it everyone else but my money is going elsewhere.

18. By Strom
    On March 8, 2015 at

    Nope, thanks!

    By Janet
    On March 6, 2015 at

    Done. Thanks!

19. By Caro
    On March 9, 2015 at

    According to DailyMail,he’ll pay £4,500,000 for the sequel
    Dakota Johnson was the reason to watch the movie.She’s a pleasure to see

20. By Strom
    On March 14, 2015 at

    Dakota is the oddest of the oddball’s!

20 Responses to “WOULD YOU PAY TO SEE TWO SEQUELS OF FIFTY SHADES OF GREY?”